Windlooker's latest activity
-
WAnother part that ties into this is the growing practice of High fences. Both times i have been involved in the building of high fences...
-
WWindlooker replied to the thread Retrieving game law.No way. A landowner should have latitude to say no. Bucksnbears said earlier he would access land to do small pushes, credit him for...
-
WWindlooker replied to the thread HF 2657 - special lottery for non-residents.From Jane Bloomingdale today: I have received a few emails about HF 2657 and wanted to provide some clarification. As I’ve worked with...
-
WWindlooker replied to the thread HF 2657 - special lottery for non-residents.Is the Texas guy the friends of Iowa dude from years ago? His handle here was Orion whitetails I believe.
-
WWindlooker replied to the thread HF 2657 - special lottery for non-residents.Yes. It’s own 160 ac or more, or if a tax return is filed with the state of Iowa.
-
WWindlooker reacted to CottonwoodCanyon's post in the thread HF 2657 - special lottery for non-residents with
Like.
That's it. Any mixed-use rec farm would qualify, right? Basically any farm with cash rent, crop-share, or CRP would qualify a NRLO for a... -
WWindlooker replied to the thread HF 2657 - special lottery for non-residents.She’s one legislator. Don’t get too comfortable. They’re used to every Iowa conservation lobbyist opposing nr legislation. It’s on...