Other states have similar programs. All the money goes to the charity/conservation group who in turn pays the DNR their tag fee and 1/2 portion. The tag purchaser can deduct the entire amount minus the tag fee since all their money goes to the charity. All the conservation/charities must meet...
I don’t think this bill would meet the rouge bill criteria that you want to stop. Looks like it will put these tags in DNR hands instead of buddies/celebrities of the aristocrats. These governor tags helped fuel the NR interest in Iowa that has hurt both Residents and Non-residents that have...
Currently the money is split 50/50 with the conservation group and the DNR after the tag fees go to the DNR. I hope all the 50 tags go into the conservation system. The IBA gets some tainted NR money every year with one of these!
I’m still saying that Hardwood11 knows more than 99% of the average hunters out there! I admire your passion and feel the same about much of what you have said. I just happen to be on the other side as a NRLO and don’t see the Sky is falling thinking on some changes. I ‘ll turkey hunt this...
Maybe everyone including residents should buy conservation licenses and pay $8,000 to $15,,000 a year. Half the money would go to a good conservation cause and the other half could go towards buying more state land for public hunting. There would be lots of public land that everyone could hunt...
I’d back the 100 more conservation tags! It would raise a lot of money for conservation, not put any more fuel on NR land rush, and with a 100 more the price might come down to a more affordable level
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.