Search results

I’d heard the same but had an incident last year that made me question it. i was getting some pics in July & august of a good buck but he didn’t look real healthy. Ribs and vertebrae were pretty noticeable. Last pics were around the 1st wk of Sep. Found him dead on the pheasant opener. He’d...

Saw spots just a few weeks ago.

Looks like they could interpret the survey as 40% are ok with a later season. I would say that only surveying 25% of the hunters isn’t a good representation anyway. Out of that 25%, how many respond and where are they located would be a good question.

That first link I posted above is a nursery that has them for sale. $16.50 1yr old $20.50 2yr old I have no connection, it come up in a google search

A google search talks about the ones found at a rest stop in Mo, and also says they were discovered in Belgium in 1843. Not sure of the difference I think this is the Mo strain. https://morsenursery.com/products/copy-of-swamp-white-hybrid-oak?variant=43933327130838 The European/asian strain...

Watch the clip of the SS snipers as the shots start. It sure looks like the sniper on the right takes “cover”. Look at his leg position and he looks like he slides back down the roof and then it’s cut off. Resignations will be rolling in shortly

Not sure what you’re asking here. We are talking deer regs.

Got a link by chance? I’d be interested in being able to share that with some doubters.

One other choice to be considered: No open seasons in November. You could keep the early seasons that are there but shut down all hunting during the rut. There is no question whether or not the older/mature bucks are hammered more in this time frame. It may also help with the “poaching” issues...

Some of you are sounding a little selfish. Why put an acre limit on LO tags? The smaller pieces probably get more time and effort promoting habitat than the big pieces. A person with 10 acres is going to work a lot harder to attract and hold the game vs the neighbor that just farms his. I would...

Sounds like it’s still left up to some interpretation, put it on paper and be done. They could make it black & white, absolutely no reason they dont

Chapter 94 “Nonresident deer hunting” Post #121, I posted a screenshot of the law for you back then Hardwood. Rule 94.4(3) Possession must match the license number and tag. Heres a link for you https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/iac/chapter/01-14-2009.571.94.pdf The very first paragraph, rule...

People keep saying the law was changed. The law didn’t change. Nothing in the wording was altered. What changed is the fact that they are going to try to enforce the law as written. Nowhere in the “Nonresident deer hunting law” did it give NR’s permission to share tags. They came out and instead...

The rules didn’t change. They just decided to enforce what was already there. The “loophole” was the fact that they weren’t enforcing the law as written. The law has been the same for many years. If the ISP came out and said they were going to strictly enforce the speed limits, would that be...

Chapter 94 spelled out the rules for nonresidents and never gave them specific permission to share tags. It states “ possession shall mean that the deer is in the possession of the person whose license number matches the number of the transportation tag on the carcass of the deer.” The previous...

Alright, here we go: I can see some confusion but under Chapter 94 “nonresident deer hunting”, it states specifically that possession must match the licensee. Chapter 106 “Deer Hunting by Residents” doesn’t use the “possession” definition during gun seasons. What they did was combine 94 &...

Ok, here’s what I’ve found. They did announce for public comment, it just wasn’t specified what changes were being made. If someone could find a copy of “Ch94”, we could see what else was changed or how it was worded previously. They rescinded Ch94 and merged it with Ch106. It looks like the...

Screenshot of the updated law:

I did find where the law was updated, not just the rule. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/iac/chapter/571.106.pdf 106.13 (2) I do know that in the past you had CO’s that said it was legal and some that didn’t. The way I’ve heard it explained was that they just clarified the rule to eliminate...

The law wasn’t changed. The law was written this way. The rules under the law were not being enforced as intended. Now that it’s been clarified, people can push to change the law or rule if they want. It wasn’t just the DNR that was required to review things. Look up “Executive Order 10”. All...