Search results

I just want to say, when I talk land prices, I'm talking Rec and I'm talking buy and hold. This says a lot. What is market value? Is there a ticker tape that I've missed? Would your 10% of work that you put in be reflected in the price if you flipped it or would it be viewed as selling it 10%...

I can't deny this thought nor did I deny this way of thinking 4 or 5 years ago when many of us thought the same thing, land would buckle with everything that was ahead of it. The reality of it is, if we were buying back then, we would be whistling today. Now we are still waiting for that...

You're going to need the total economic package to go against farms before you see a meaningful drop in land prices. A prolonged recession with high unemployment would do it. There is just too much outside money feeding a lifestyle people crave.

At least he has some bullets in his mag so they don't have to print a bunch of money. I guess i'd rather be too slow than to early and ignite inflation again. Like you said, tough to nail it.

Report card time. This is where the ugly starts if it's going to. He'll either be elevated to economic God or just another ignorant government employee.:)

Just a few thoughts. The cost of land now reflects all the negatives that has been thrown at it. Higher interest rates, a bout with inflation, incomes that haven't caught up with that inflation, low commodity prices, Biden. Don't get that twisted, all of that has had a negative affect on land...

Lots of hearsay out there. That's classic government. Watch what they do and not what they say. Honestly, I would feel bad for the Non res who sells their property without waiting for the absolutes...it may not even come to be. Longshot but with all the chaos they have created now backing off...

Thinking likewise

There is always unintended consequences. How did ol Newton say it...for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

They'll rethink it. Probably start hunting heated blinds during late ML season over corn. I wonder what would cause more damage, late ML in heated blinds over corn or party hunting with the residents?

I'm not denying this, as I said, I agree on this also. Not necessarily how it came down or the end product. An across the board no party hunting with a doe doe tag only, would have been more beneficial but then again, I don't elevate myself to the "master hunter" status. I agree to this also...

Possibly add a dislike? :)

As I said earlier in this thread, I think this is a good move, especially party hunting with only a doe tag. You can't trap with a fishing license. This should hold true for residents also. I don't believe that it's some loophole or gray area, the law was just changed. Probably illegally but...

This poll is about as credible as a CNN presidential poll ran in Massachusetts.

How exactly did this read last year?

They need to grow some sacks. With the split in politics, NR vs resident and trophy hunter vs occasional hunter...this has been very calm and collected for a legislative forum.

Not a chance in hell that they'll get them all written in stone. They'll pick and choose. Should we be waiting for a yardage on mineral licks before they consider it baiting? The DNR lives and breaths on stuff like that. A working farm before you get a LO tag? Come on man :)

Instead of tweaking, abolishing and creating laws slanted towards the trophy hunter, we need to keep and create laws for the betterment the herd as a whole and let the chips fall as they may.

Exactly...if you think you are going to do away with party hunting you're pissing in the wind. Wasted energy. I wish they would clean up law and define the non use of cell cams during the season.

Resident or non, no one should be able to hunt either sex on a doe tag. You should be required to have a live or spent any sex tag in your pocket if you're party hunting.