Fishbonker
Life Member
Christams is just around the corner, at least that what Madison Avenue wants you to think. I'm gonna start dropping hints for the wife about what I want for Christmas. You know, subtle hints like a wish list taped to the side of her lawn and leaf bag that she uses to pick up 5 cent deposit cans and bottles in the ditches. I figure if she picks up the pace a little she should have enough for the pair of 8.5X56 Nikon Monarchs I want. Most of you like the 8X42s. Anybody have any experience with the 8.5X56? The math says they should be quite a bit brighter than the 42s but they are gonna be bigger and heavier. I'm of the philosophy "go big or go home" and "better to have 'em and not need 'em than need 'em and not have 'em". In my search of this forum for "binoculars" there is only one reference and I think it was one guy (Certral Iowa?) that reccomended getting the biggest objective lens you can. I don't wanna go any higher mag than 8.5 so 56 is the biggest lens I can get. The other draw back to the 8.5X56 is the close focus distance is 33 feet and the 42s are 8 feet. Thats roughly 10 yards to 3 yards. In tree stand parlance, 10 yards is pretty close.
So whadaya think, 8.5X56 or 8X42? I think she has time to get the cans, that is if Muddy doesn't beat her to them.
The 'Bonker
So whadaya think, 8.5X56 or 8X42? I think she has time to get the cans, that is if Muddy doesn't beat her to them.
The 'Bonker