Buck Hollow Sporting Goods - click or touch to visit their website Midwest Habitat Company

Is this muzzle loader legal in Iowa

B

buckknife

Guest
http://www.ultimatefirearms.com/product1.html
Is this gun legal here in the muzzle loader season?if so why....
mad.gif

We arnt allowed to use center fire single shot high power rifles that shoot at these speeds and less.
This gun has no place in any season here as far as i can see.
When you get to the link click on specifications to see the price and the powder load.
It is said it will push a 300gr bullet at 2900fps and a 180gr at 3100 fps.
How long will it be before some one makes a cheaper copy of this gun?and they sell like hot cakes.
ooo.gif
 
Interesting! It looks legal to me. How do they shoot 200-250 grains of black powder and get it all to burn?
 
I was wondering the same thing.They have taken deer size game out to 400 yards it said.
I talked to a guy on another form and he said it is the most accurate muzzle loader he has ever seen.
I think it sould be outlawed here in Iowa.It has as good of ballistics as a 7mm mag with a heavyer bullet even.
Is this what anyone would call a safe gun for deer season,and if so why not make single shot highpowers legal.
confused.gif
 
Forgot to add he uses a 250gr charge of pellets and says it is super accurate.
Same down range ballistics of a 300 win mag.
smashcomp.gif
 
Howa action, Walther barrel, Boyds stock. Yes it could be made cheaper. If cheap is what people want.

The State laws are always being refined to keep up with the times be it crooks or advances in technology.

I do agree that a line in the sand needs to be drawn on "Primative" weapons.

Inlines using 209 primers, now this...
Progress, it's a vicious beast.
shrug[1].gif


I can't point to any reason it could not be used this shotgun season. So keep your head down!
sniper.gif
 
I the only way 250 gr. of powder are able to burn completly up is the extra length of the barrel. It seems mostly muzzle loaders barrel are either 22 or 24 inches in length. So may be the extra 2 to 4 inches gives it enough time to burn all of the powder so all of the gases can push that size of a bullet that rate of speed. But you wouldn't think that 2 inches would make much of a difference.
Or the only thing I can think of is they ar stretching the truth about there bullistic speed just so they could get more sales.

jason
 
...here is my 2 cents...the early muzzleloader season in Iowa should be restricted to traditional front stuffers and the late season could then be open to all muzzleloaders...its not that I am against modern muzzleloaders...my fear is that pretty soon the "centerfire" abilities will begin to draw the 'slob' shotgunners looking to get the first crack at the deer herd...this would be especially true if legislation is re-introduced (and passed) that allowed for party hunting during the muzzleloader seasons like it was a few years back...
893soapbox-thumb[1].gif
 
Looks legal by Iowa definition but maybe one of the COs can comment. Where I hunt I can't see 400 yards let alone shoot that far.
 
What kind of recoil is this thing going to produce. My encore shot with 150 grains of powder nearly broke my shoulder. Any thoughts on this?
 
shredder im beten it would be a might fierce.A super thick recoil pad could absorbe some it but it would still kick like a mule no doubt.
 
I agree that early muzzleloader season should be primitive weapons only, but why would you want to get rid of a single shot system that gives you everything that you want. Speed, accuracy. Why would any one object to technolgy. Where does it stop, Knight, Thompson Center Fire, these are very advanaced center fire muzzloader's as well, should we outlaw these to. There is only one shot no matter how far the bullet can go. You guys must forget what country you live in. This country you are free to make what choices you want and if you want to hunt with something like this you should have the right to. I personally hunt with a recurve and a flint lock muzzleloader.How many of you can say that? This is my choice and I do not judge anyone else on how they want to hunt. Remember that this is a free country and if you choose to hunt or choose not to, either way you should not be judged by what or how you do this as long as it don't affect anyone else. Why would any of you want more regs or laws. If you all want that go to Russia.
wall.gif
 
trogster a flinter and a stick bow,you da man
cool.gif
I wish i was good enough with my stick bow to have enough confadance to use it,and i would like to have a flinter.
I have a 50 inline i use in shotgun season and a 54 gpr for muzzle loader season.
Now i have no problem with someone using a inline during any season if in the hands of a capable hunter.
Most of the inlines are advertised as 200 yard guns,and in the hands of the right hunter with good common sense they can be.some one who has taken the time to really work up a load and practice to be proficent at that range under the right conditons.
How many of the people shooting this far will take into account wind drift and the fact they may be shooting off hand and not from a bench?
what about the newbe who sees the advertisement for a new inline,pops a some pellets down the bore and bullet and goes out and shoots a few shots at 50 or 100 yards off a bench and is ready for a 200 yard shot at a live deer?
nono.gif

Now we have a gun advertised to be a 400 yard gun.
Now i can hit a target with decent accuracy at 200 yards off a rest but i wouldnt try it on real game shooting off hand.
Its the advetisement of muzzle loaders having center fire capabilitys that i dont like.
Its the fear by some hunters that once the dnr are convinced that the inlines have reached centerfire capabilitys that they may do away with muzzle loading seasons all togeather.I dont think that will happen here for a while but someday a line may have to be drawen somewhere.
everthing stated above is only my opinion,nothing more.
893soapbox-thumb[1].gif
 
Nice post Buckknife. I see that you do care but it tears me up when I see anyone wanting certain things outlawed. It starts to sound like gun control lobbyists and our enemies at PETA. All those people want to be controled and want to live in a place that they are too stupid too realize how too get there. Those people don't realize that if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. And that is a fact not too be disputed. Don't get me wrong here I don't put you or any other person that I have read on here in that catagory but we need to keep the government out or they and the gun control nuts will never stop.
893USA1-thumb[1].gif
 
Although some laws seem to exist for no reason at all, the regulations that control weapon choice are needed. It has nothing to do with the feds controlling you. It's has everything to do with safety. It's a matter of not effecting others, like was said. The regulations are always a step behind. So as new products emerge new regulations are needed. Call it gun grabbing if you want.
 
Safety??? I believe just 2 years ago a box cutter took down 4 airplanes and killed thousands of people. Maybe there should be more regs on boxcutters. How about all the people that die each year in auto accidents. Drownings? Maybe we should outlaw vehicles and prohibit all water activities. Not to mention all the other things that we can do in the name of safety! How about everyone take responsibilty for what they do and if they don't they will pay dearly. I can see you responding like you did with a bio like federal employee. You must like to be controled and regulated. Like I said above if you like that there is country's out there for you. And the problem is they are in more turmoil than a free one!! Go figure! I hope people wake up before we end up like Australia and UK. Not to mention other country's. Too many people died for the freedom's we have, to have anyone want more control. I hope you will see that someday but maybe you won't have a job when that happens.
biggun.gif
893USA1-thumb[1].gif
 
In my shotgun only counties I hunt I will be using my Omega blackpowder instead of my 11/87. I can shoot 200 yards with my omega and only just over 100 with my 11/87 all I need is one shot. My opinion is they made shotgun only counties to keep it to short range weaponds, but know with blackpowders that shoot over 200 yards what will they do?
 
Heres something I found on a good fact web site.

giving me an opportunity to address the claims being made by Ultimate Firearms. You are not the first to question their performance claims.


FORTUNATELY, the muzzleloding hunter's quest to own and shoot the absolute best shooting and hardest hitting high performance muzzleloading big game rifle (and load) possible has resulted in the introduction of ALL of the newer rifle models we now enjoy, plus the further development of loading components for better accuary and greater knockdown power. UNFORTUANTELY, the goal of just about every muzzleloading rifle manufacturer has become to promote their rifles as the fastest and hardest hitting. The result has become what I like to refer to as published "voodoo ballistics". Quite honestly, no one can achieve the velocities claimed by a great percentage of today's modern in-line rifle makers.


Ultimate Firearms has taken such "voodoo ballistics" to a brand new level.


I caught wind of their claims about five or six months back, and did manage to talk with them on the phone. It took me less than a minute to realize that I was being fed a heap of sales hype. At that time, they were being more modest, claiming that with a four-pellet 200-grain charge of Pyrodex Pellets, they could get a 300 grain bullet out of the muzzle of their BP Express rifle at more than 2,300 f.p.s., which would produce more than 3,500 f.p.e. (Now they are claiming 2,900 f.p.s. with five Pyrodex Pellets - or a 250 grain powder charge.) They attribute the "unbelievable" velocities to a vastly improved breech plug design that greatly enhances the burn of the pelletized powder.


To all of their claims...HIGH PERFORMANCE MUZZLELOADING says... "IT CANNOT BE DONE!!!!"


One of the most efficient ignition systems ever devloped has been that found on the Savage "smokeless powder" muzzleloaders - the original Model 10ML and the current Model 10ML II.
Three years ago, I did all of the initial testing of this rifle for Savage Arms, determining the range of powders that shot well out of the muzzleloader, plus compiling the ballistics for them. And this included the shooting of Pyrodex and Pyrodex Pellets.
Since this rifle has been built to stand up to the pressures of smokeless powders, I knew I could not damage the rifle with ANY AMOUNT of Pyrodex...so set out to see what the absolute maximum "beneficial" charge of Pyrodex Pellets would be in this system.


I started by chronographing a 150-grain three-pellet charge of Pyrodex behind both saboted 250- and 300-grain bullets. Velocity with the 250-grain bullet was 1,955 f.p.s., the 300-grain bullet left the muzzle at 1,908 f.p.s.
I then dropped in three of the 50-grain pellets and one 30 grain pellet, for a 180-grain charge. The resulting velocity with a still lighter 240 grain bullet was only 2,014 f.p.s. Next, I dropped in four of the 50-grain Pyrodex Pellets behind the saboted 240 grain bullet (Hornady XTP-MAG) and velocity actually went backwards to 1,988 f.p.s. Before concluding nearly a week of testing with Pyrodex Pellets, I tried just about every combination of pellet charges and saboted bullets conceivable...and could not top the 2,014 f.p.s. velocity achieved with the 180-grain pellet charge behind the 240 grain saboted bullet.


I concluded that it was impossible to get a .50 caliber in-line rifle (any .50 caliber in-line rifle) to break even 2,100 f.p.s. with bullets of 240 grains and up - NO MATTER HOW MANY PYRODEX PELLETS WERE LOADED BEHIND IT! More recent testing with hotter yet Triple Seven Pellets has resulted in getting a 240-grain bullet out of the Model 10ML II at 2,018 f.p.s. when loaded with a 200-grain four-pellet charge. A three-pellet (150-grain) charge averaged 2,027 f.p.s. More is not better when it comes to the pellets, adding the weight and drag of forward unburnt pellets to that of the projectile, resulting in slower velocity.
With that said, I do feel that any breech plug that could help insure a more complete burn of the compressed pellets would likely give a a slight increase in velocity...but no where near what Ultimate Firearms is now claiming. For the record, when I tried loading four of the 50-grain Pyrodex Pellets behind a saboted 300-grain Hornady XTP, my velocity with the Savage Model 10ML II didn't even break 1,900 f.p.s., or around 400 f.p.s. slower than the velocity Ultimate Firearms is claiming with a 200-grain pellet charge and 300 grain bullet with their rifle. Now they've upped their claims to 2,900 f.p.s. with a 250-grain charge.


All I have to say to that is...YEAH, RIGHT!


As for your second question, I did use a sub-base, fashioned from the obturator cup clipped from the base of a Winchester 28-gauge "AA" wad, beneath my sabot and bullet for MOST of the shooting I have done with Hornady's new SST bullets. However, this was done primarily due to the fact that most of this shooting was done in extremely hot summer-time weather, with temperatures around 90-degrees. The sub-base simply protects the base of the sabot from the pressures created by magnum powder charges. And this is very important during hot summer weather when the plastic is softer and more pliable. Without the sub-base, accuracy tends to suffer. However, now that it is beginning to cool down, I'll be doing a lot more shooting with the sabot seated directly over the powder charge.


Benny, I just enjoy shooting too much to stay at home when it gets hot outside. Thanks a million for e-mailing in your questions. Have a great season, and be sure to send photos if you get a big one this fall. - Toby Bridges, HIGH PERFORMANCE MUZZLELOADING
 
Top Bottom