loneranger
Well-Known Member
That Penttigil Gal sure is determined to get more Non-Resident hunting in here isn't she? Think I got her name mispelled,,sorry.
I don't think she can be convinced, but I do think she can be voted out.
......and quickly got one back explaining how we are throwing other severe State issues "under the bus" by not expanding the NR deer tags by 6000.
I don't think she can be convinced, but I do think she can be voted out.
You guys would judge a legislator's performance based on keeping the same or less non-resident deer hunters out of the state? That really explains why some things in iowa are the way they are..
i shes got the sagging economy to deal with, poverty, education, law enforcement, etc. appeasing a single minor issue lobbying group or two, especially for deer hunting, probably doesn't rate super high on the list of priorities. QUOTE]
You misspoke I believe. It should say, " probably shouldn't rate high on the list of priorities." This should be one of the last things she should be worried about right now.
i mean, look at it from her standpoint. she's a state legislator. shes got the sagging economy to deal with, poverty, education, law enforcement, etc. appeasing a single minor issue lobbying group or two, especially for deer hunting, probably doesn't rate super high on the list of priorities. You guys would judge a legislator's performance based on keeping the same or less non-resident deer hunters out of the state? That really explains why some things in iowa are the way they are..
haves vs. have nots view. as i've said for a while, if you don't have land, buy it!
I own land in Iowa, and (unlike you) believe it's about the best state in the union! If you don't live here, and hate it so much; why are you hanging out on a forum dedicated to Iowa hunting, trapping, and fishing? Certainly you must have concerns on the condition of the deer herd in your own state?so i'm uninformed if i disagree with your stance? of course the IWF is going to put that small NR view on tags on their website, they'd be foolish not to. They're a lobbying group. typical haves vs. have nots view. as i've said for a while, if you don't have land, buy it!