Buck Hollow Sporting Goods - click or touch to visit their website Midwest Habitat Company

Poll Question #3: Should NR doe tags be limited

Should NR doe tags be limited to when a person has a buck tag?

  • Yes

    Votes: 41 65.1%

  • No

    Votes: 13 20.6%

  • NRLO’s SHOULD NOT HAVE DOE TAGS LIMITED

    Votes: 12 19.0%

  • NRLO’s SHOULD HAVE DOE TAGS LIMITED

    Votes: 11 17.5%
  • Total voters
    63
That's a tough one. Maybe it should be limited to NRLO only?
Otherwise as a NRLO, you are limited to only hunting does when you have a buck tag, which we know is 5-6 year wait for archery and 2-3 for shotgun.
As a NRLO, I have bought the $400 doe tag plenty of times during gun season, just to be able to sit and hunt my own farm.
 
JBAGS said:
That's a tough one. Maybe it should be limited to NRLO only?
Otherwise as a NRLO, you are limited to only hunting does when you have a buck tag, which we know is 5-6 year wait for archery and 2-3 for shotgun.
As a NRLO, I have bought the $400 doe tag plenty of times during gun season, just to be able to sit and hunt my own farm.
Click to expand...
Good differentiator. I should reword the question.
 
DOR said:
What I would say, is that if I need to wait 4 years and pay 700 bucks to hunt (which is fine), I should not have to buy a $100 doe tag. Make it optional.
Click to expand...
Seems like extortion by the State to force NR's to buy a doe tag, IMO.
 
It’s nice the DNR gets $$ but also hard to justify why non-residents get an antlerless tag in some areas and residents can’t. Hard to cry about population when non residents are required to buy a doe tag too. I’d personally rather just see them stuck paying more for the anysex tag. I don’t really care either way.. just hard to defend why those that draw an anysex automatically get an antlerless tag when residents can’t
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom