Plus another 1... 49
I I-state_hunters New Member Oct 21, 2011 #43 +1 Antlerless... Technically it was a spike buck but didnt have the obvious genetics that I wanted to let knock up the does with... =51
+1 Antlerless... Technically it was a spike buck but didnt have the obvious genetics that I wanted to let knock up the does with... =51
biggest buck Active Member Oct 21, 2011 #46 Non-typ. said: Hope you put your buck tag on it. Click to expand... Would you?
dedgeez death from above Oct 21, 2011 #47 QUOTE=kyleRupp;440445]plus 1= 10[/QUOTE] No sir, I don't think it does..........
I I-state_hunters New Member Oct 21, 2011 #48 Non-typ. said: Hope you put your buck tag on it. Click to expand... By spike buck I meant to infer that there was no fork and therefore is considered a antlerless deer using the same tag as a doe. Didnt mean to offend anyone...
Non-typ. said: Hope you put your buck tag on it. Click to expand... By spike buck I meant to infer that there was no fork and therefore is considered a antlerless deer using the same tag as a doe. Didnt mean to offend anyone...
TheMadCatter Well-Known Member Oct 22, 2011 #50 I-state_hunters said: By spike buck I meant to infer that there was no fork and therefore is considered a antlerless deer using the same tag as a doe. Didnt mean to offend anyone... Click to expand... Did he say antlerless? Nope, he said DOE.
I-state_hunters said: By spike buck I meant to infer that there was no fork and therefore is considered a antlerless deer using the same tag as a doe. Didnt mean to offend anyone... Click to expand... Did he say antlerless? Nope, he said DOE.
Bonehunter24 Member Oct 23, 2011 #51 I hunt with another guy that's not a member but we have taken 5 so far. so 52+5=57