Midwestprowler
New Member
Add 2 For me & my Brother = 189 Both taken 10/20/2012 Early muzzleloader Iowa :way:
jesserichard
New Member
2 so far for me 191+2=193
HUNTING BB
Active Member
+1 =194 .
HUNTING BB
Active Member
sorry 195 .
livetohunt
Member
i got 5 during first shotgun 196+5 = 201
blake
Life Member
In a state with a drop in the deer numbers, you guys that shot does have just reduced the herd by at least 630 deer that will not be around next year to hunt.
I am also confident that many members didn’t even post the number of antlerless deer in this thread that they shot.
And certainly not everyone that shot antlerless deer are members of this website, so we have no idea how many antlerless deer they killed.
Then there is the number of shed bucks that were harvest during the antlerless season??????
So those of you that are complaining about deer numbers may wish to start educating your fellow deer hunters?
JMO
I am also confident that many members didn’t even post the number of antlerless deer in this thread that they shot.
And certainly not everyone that shot antlerless deer are members of this website, so we have no idea how many antlerless deer they killed.
Then there is the number of shed bucks that were harvest during the antlerless season??????
So those of you that are complaining about deer numbers may wish to start educating your fellow deer hunters?
JMO
hoosierhunter
Active Member
Not a fair statement. The reason the state was hit so hard with ehd was due to over population in those areas. You have extreme have and have not areas in Iowa.
blake
Life Member
EHD should have been all the more reason to limit or stop antlerless hunting!
