Ok there's 100% without a shadow of a doubt a huge benefit to having so much ground as a sanctuary in your state 2 out of every 3 years.
I
Yes there is a benefit but that's not what you said. And the size of that benefit is debatable.
Ok there's 100% without a shadow of a doubt a huge benefit to having so much ground as a sanctuary in your state 2 out of every 3 years.
I
Now that is happening because of the regulations which I'm not arguing should be changed. The fact remains that all your NR enemies typically are in the upper half of deer managers. Guys aren't spending that kind of money to shoot little deer.
It's amazing how quickly everyone forgets all the good that comes from NR's as opposed to thinking they are the plague!
Forgotten almost as quickly as local residents access to private ground. Your comments are laughable. I will hold my tongue.
You beat me to it. I was just thinking it does residents a lot of good to have big deer on properties they can't hunt.
Forgotten almost as quickly as local residents access to private ground. Your comments are laughable. I will hold my tongue.
You beat me to it. I was just thinking it does residents a lot of good to have big deer on properties they can't hunt.
Go complain to all your farmers buying up your ground before you cast stones at every non resident!
Lol you guys act like land is so "unaffordable" in Iowa. Give me a break, paying 2-3k per acre for top hunting ground is a drop in the bucket compared to other Midwestern states.
Hate to break it to everyone but there is a significant correlation between all of Iowa's big deer and the NR farms only being hunted once every three years. Take those same farms and let your shotgun groups hunt them year in and year out and the great hunting will disappear quicker than allowing NR's to hunt every year!
Dude, for real? On one of your envious, hatred filled earlier post's you stated you own several farms, guess what...that would make you "wealthy". Would it not? Easy to see who you really are. As for the whining... for someone with so much, you have them all beat.
None of these guys "bent the crap out of the rules" they followed the rules to get their residency, and then the rules were changed. Thanks to you and "neighbors" like you. Congratulations, I'm glad I don't own beside you. As far as "nervous", not likely. Give it up DUDE...its bad karma.
Ok there's 100% without a shadow of a doubt a huge benefit to having so much ground as a sanctuary in your state 2 out of every 3 years.
I
Go complain to all your farmers buying up your ground before you cast stones at every non resident!
Without a shadow of a doubt, there is a real problem with all that "sanctuary" ground being posted "NO HUNTING" to resident hunters that used to enjoy hunting there. Eventually, the residents that can not afford hunting ground have to take up knitting. Not really a good alternative....you think?
I have hunted deer in Texas and spoke with locals that said they can not afford to hunt deer in their own state because it is primarily "pay to play". Why on earth would Iowa want to head down that same path. It's broken. It makes absolutley no sense. It is simple logic. But, selfish wants always cloud good logic. You and many like you have already proven that point all too clearly. There is no argument against it that is not pure fallacy or greed. None, and I have heard them all.
I went back and read this thread and had to pull out this gem. I seriously did laugh out loud at this one! Please explain to me who owned the farm ground prior to our farmers that are supposedly buying it up. Was it non-farmers?! Is there new ground that is hitting the market for the very first time? Last I heard, they quit making ground quite a while ago...LOL Perfect example of absolutely no substance to the argument here folks.
Most of the farmers I know will still let a lot of local guys hunt if asked. They want the deer killed to reduce crop damage. But, they do hate the amount of deer that come off the nonresident farms that are closed to hunting. Kind of weird when you consider that these "sanctuaries" are considered a real positive by some. See where this is going....? Probably not if you have selfish wants.
I do hope that every single resident complaining about NR land being locked up is personally letting people hunt their property because they feel bad for their "people". Throw them a bone, open it up. Until that's truly the case it's just hypocritical to get angry with others about it.
We let people hunt our ground during late muzzy. Only season we don't hunt it. We also let them coyote hunt. We also have a five acre pond that we let people fish. If we were to shut access down we could easily turn this farm into a "sanctuary" but it's just kind of hard to turn other hunters and fisherman down when I hunt and fish other properties that don't belong to me. That's hypocritical in my book.