big Saskatchewan buck!

[bowhunter22]

I think 190 was left in the dust on that monster!

 

[SaskGuy]

I saw a pic of a 5x5 today on my wife's phone, shot in our town, has to gross 200 typ.

 

[Carll]

Any pic's of that monster ?

 

[ShedHunter1]

Wow I think the pictures threw us all off. Still a giant!!

 

[LYON]

WHAT??? That's crazy! Those pics were really deceiving! Still an awesome buck though.

 

[flugge]

so was it shot in 2005? according to score sheet???

 

[tfran123]

It just lacks a little mass, great length however. Could have been a younger deer with massive potential, would be shocked if it was a 4 year old given the mass and lack of junk.

 

[AIRASSAULT]

so was it shot in 2005? according to score sheet???

Good call....

 

[ShedHunter1]

Kaare will probably know more, but it seems they have it narrowed down to the area it was killed in. But not really how it was killed?
Date is wrong was killed this year.

 

[gansomn]

Just posted...... and its already went through its drying period and a final score The date of measure at the bottom looks like 2006

 

[SaskGuy]

I'm not making any bets that scoresheet is in fact from this yr and from that deer.....but not making any bets it isn't either.

 

[ShedHunter1]

Somethings definetly wierd Kaare. Look at the inside spread and the tip to tip spread??

 

[flugge]

I cant believe that scoresheet is from the same deer based off of main beam length...the buck pictured has to have beams longer than that imo

 

[VictoryOutdoor]

Great buck! Congrats

 

[ARbowhtr]

I don't think the deer and score sheet match either, there is no way the left G2 and G3 are the same length and the G4 is two in shorter. But I may be wrong, time will tell.

 

[ShedderKG]

That can't be right.