There’s 0% doubt in my mind that when we have a nice full growing season coming off a mild winter with PLENTY OF RAIN..... racks are bigger & deer make awesome jumps. The reverse is true as well (ON AVERAGE).... drought + hard winter & high heat- racks don’t jump much.... or what they “should or could have” - had it been a great year. There’s 0 doubt in my mind after watching this play out year after year. How this year shapes up??? Dunno.... tough winter. Warm/cold/warm/cold spring. Pretty good rain where I’m at. Jury is still out. Not 100% ideal- that’s for sure.
HERE’S MY QUESTION..... if u agree with above & also have seen this.... which is correct, it just is (good growing years all the way to crappy years)..... why don’t so many other areas experience this like we do??? Or maybe they do????
For example...... western 1/3rd or even 2/3rd of KS has far less rain fall but they pump out giants. Same with Canada- harsh winters, late springs, etc. south past iowa it greens up earlier & milder winters. On and on. So many other regions with giant deer potential that have far more challenging growing conditions.
SIDE NOTE: maybe u say “well Kansas, on average, is really about 20”-30” behind on their very top end giants vs iowa for same age”. Maybe true. Maybe Canada is same way & just takes em to 7-9 years old for those few to become “giant”.
In theory- the best growing regions would be the highest rain fall, with crop land, with Milder (not devastating) winters.... say “Kentucky” for example. Or southern IL. I still don’t think they have pound for pound as good of top end deer though.
Anyways - before I ramble on too far....
1) thoughts on growing seasons impacting growth? Good or bad
2) this year ??
3) how can we take the “growing season” analogy to compare to areas that do produce mammoths but have far less ideal conditions? “Not really better or bigger”? Or “adapted to those regions”? Or “they still have fluctuations like we do”?
See what I mean? Sorry on the rambling but trying to put thoughts into type & also see if folks have some thoughts on any of this.
HERE’S MY QUESTION..... if u agree with above & also have seen this.... which is correct, it just is (good growing years all the way to crappy years)..... why don’t so many other areas experience this like we do??? Or maybe they do????
For example...... western 1/3rd or even 2/3rd of KS has far less rain fall but they pump out giants. Same with Canada- harsh winters, late springs, etc. south past iowa it greens up earlier & milder winters. On and on. So many other regions with giant deer potential that have far more challenging growing conditions.
SIDE NOTE: maybe u say “well Kansas, on average, is really about 20”-30” behind on their very top end giants vs iowa for same age”. Maybe true. Maybe Canada is same way & just takes em to 7-9 years old for those few to become “giant”.
In theory- the best growing regions would be the highest rain fall, with crop land, with Milder (not devastating) winters.... say “Kentucky” for example. Or southern IL. I still don’t think they have pound for pound as good of top end deer though.
Anyways - before I ramble on too far....
1) thoughts on growing seasons impacting growth? Good or bad
2) this year ??
3) how can we take the “growing season” analogy to compare to areas that do produce mammoths but have far less ideal conditions? “Not really better or bigger”? Or “adapted to those regions”? Or “they still have fluctuations like we do”?
See what I mean? Sorry on the rambling but trying to put thoughts into type & also see if folks have some thoughts on any of this.