Daver, good points. But, do you really think there are that many more 3 and 4 year olds now than there were 20 years ago? Or were they there then, but without cameras and the amount of time spent chasing them now...they just weren't seen like they are today? The general consensus sounds like there were fewer hunters...so I'm just wondering if it was more perception than reality that there were fewer 3 to 4 year olds than there are now?
I can only give my opinion and it is of course heavily biased by my personal observations, but yes, in general, I think that there are many more 3 and 4 year old bucks today than there were say 20 years ago. But this is highly situational and location specific. The main area that I did 90%+ of my deer hunting 20'ish years ago almost never had a 3 year old on it back then. Between myself and several other guys, sans trail cams of course
, we just simply did not see bucks in that age class hardly ever.
I remember one year that there was a 160'ish "in the neighborhood" and we all were after him and he lasted about 3 weeks until one of the neighbors got him. When we weren't sitting in stands, we were running drives...a lot. There were good deer numbers, but
very few older bucks. There were a number of pretty effective deer slayers, if not very selective.
To my recollection, I was the first one to "pass" a clear shot at a buck in that neighborhood, due to some reading that I had been doing during the early stages of popularization of deer management. My fellow hunters were aghast that anyone would not shoot a buck. This was about 18-20 years ago.
That exact same neighborhood now produces at least 3 or 4 140"+ bucks per year, that I know about, including some that are well above 150". There were none back then, that we ever saw, even though we were out there all season long. The difference...no deer drives during archery season to speak of, several property owners self restricting on buck shooting, multiple food plots and other habitat improvements.