JNRBRONC
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
Geez, that last one was a tough one. Archery in Schools or public lands, we really need both.
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought the last one was tough because the # of CO's has been dwindling and who is going to watch over new public ground and additional antlerless seasons?
Without throwing gas on the fire,the second question maybe could have been split as some might
be in favor of the one of the two new antlerless season. As it is worded, you are either for or against both.
Geez, that last one was a tough one. Archery in Schools or public lands, we really need both.
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought the last one was tough because the # of CO's has been dwindling and who is going to watch over new public ground and additional antlerless seasons?
Without throwing gas on the fire,the second question maybe could have been split as some might
sureshot
The Hunt Never Ends....
Huh, All I hear is how everyone on this website is worried about the youth of America being 'lazy' or 'addicted' to games, but not surprisingly it has the lowest amount of votes for the archery in schools program. Don't you think that archery in schools would get more youngsters like myself involved in bowhunting? I know it would. If you want something to be better shouldn't you back it up, or just sit back and complain? Just my 2 cents.
teeroy
Life Member
i'm not overly concerned with the governor's tags personally. i don't see where there is a big need for them, but since there are only 15-25 tags allotted a year, there are many much more serious issues we should be tackling. a couple tv personalities, shooting bucks isn't as dangerous to the quality of hunting in iowa as the NR tag cap
