<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It is against the law for the state to compete in a business against the private sector</div></div>
I wasen't thinking of this as a competing buisness, I was thinking along the lines of keeping deer out of residential neighborhoods, not eating crops, and not getting hit by cars. Deer Hunting is big buisness in Iowa, so there is already a competition there.
Insurance Companies and Farmers want deer population low, hunters want it high. By fencing in a property, you could have both.
I know this is a wacky idea, but imagine a worse case senario, like deer being put in the same category as Coyotes and their population virtually disappearing. Wouldn't something like this be an alternative? I know, the response will be "it will never happen". Just play along.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I can't see a lot of Iowa residents wanting to hunt a "high fence" operation....I know I wouldn't hunt it</div></div>
If your only choices of hunting were an unfenced over hunted public land, or properly managed fenced in public land which would you choose? If an outfitter gave you a free pass and said "come shoot any deer you want" are you saying you would pass it up?
Could you describe a possible "high fence" operation that would have the feel of a free range hunt? Deer only roam so far, so fence or no fence, they are going to walk under your treestand or they wont.
Questions I have, if you will play along with the idea
1. How many acres minimum
2. How many deer could be supported per acre with a natural food sources?
3. How many deer could be supported per acre with added food sources, corn, soybeans, etc?
4. What kind of buck to doe ratio would be maintained on the property?
5. Could CWD be eliminated within this population ?