Windlooker
Well-Known Member
This would be an easy quantitative statistical study. Yea there may be other variables but the attention from celeb hunters is the primary factor.
Junior , is the wealthy a**hole person, as cited by Obsessed, buying up the ground around you a resident or NR??
I've never heard a serious whitetail hunter once complain about being in a highly managed neighborhood until now. This is what all diehards strive for and search for. I'm guessing you are mainly hunting for meat? I'd give my left arm to get into a better "highly managed neighborhood." As for the doe overpopulation, working with neighbors and each landowner taking several does can fix that fairly quickly.I’m going to say worse! Our areas keep going downhill every year because of the “highly managed neighborhoods” where most of the neighbors are out of state owners chasing one big bucks a year and the doe population is out of control.
Great video and spot on! What we have going against us as hunters looking for mature, giant bucks, is that we are in the minority. Most hunters want it to be as easy as possible to kill bucks. They want guns, crossbows, more liberal seasons, bait, and anything allows them to kill bucks with the least effort. It is definitely going to be a HUGE challenge for Iowa hunters to keep the state in the Unicorn status that it has today.Alright…. Here u go…. Draft. I actually did this BEFORE this thread was started. I’ll post on IW YouTube, etc when it’s done. Got short one and longer one. This is shorter. Lemme know what u think….
Skip Sligh - Bryce meis
This video hosted by SmugMug; your photos and videos look better here.brycemeis.smugmug.com
Do folks realize Iowa is last in the continental United States in % of acres open to public access (.7%)? DEAD LAST. This is an issue.
I think the key to this is the phrase, "highly managed neighborhood". Not shooting enough does to keep a population somewhat balanced is not really highly managed, although people will use that phrase to describe their practices. The problem can be that some neighbors will not shoot enough does and only focus on mature bucks so as to create an imbalance...an imbalance that neighboring responsible landowners are then "forced" to handle or put up with.I've never heard a serious whitetail hunter once complain about being in a highly managed neighborhood until now. This is what all diehards strive for and search for. I'm guessing you are mainly hunting for meat? I'd give my left arm to get into a better "highly managed neighborhood." As for the doe overpopulation, working with neighbors and each landowner taking several does can fix that fairly quickly.
AgreeGreat video and spot on! What we have going against us as hunters looking for mature, giant bucks, is that we are in the minority. Most hunters want it to be as easy as possible to kill bucks. They want guns, crossbows, more liberal seasons, bait, and anything allows them to kill bucks with the least effort. It is definitely going to be a HUGE challenge for Iowa hunters to keep the state in the Unicorn status that it has today.
lol well you have now and no we are not hunting for meat besides a few does for some deer sticks and summer sausage. We could kill 50 does off each farm every year and you would never know you shot any the next year.I've never heard a serious whitetail hunter once complain about being in a highly managed neighborhood until now. This is what all diehards strive for and search for. I'm guessing you are mainly hunting for meat? I'd give my left arm to get into a better "highly managed neighborhood." As for the doe overpopulation, working with neighbors and each landowner taking several does can fix that fairly quickly.
Percentage of land open to public hunting.Public access to government owned land?
I can't follow what you're saying here. It sounds like you're making both better and worse statements. Can't tell if was is intentional or not.Worse by far…I use to hate “deer drives” but a guy that bow hunted his entire life killing giants explained how those drives made hunting better every year and now with guys managing for high scoring bucks it’s went down hill. Guys won’t kill a 145” buck that’s 5,+ years old and many say he’s not old enough based on score alone when they don’t have a clue. More “inferior” less scoring deer were killed back when everything was shotgun hunted. I could keep going but I’m busy at work lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I can't follow what you're saying here. It sounds like you're making both better and worse statements. Can't tell if was is intentional or not.
Thanks for posting. Interesting about the age claim. I wonder how they record the buck ages. I know I've never reported the guestimated age of any of my deer, and I've never sent in teeth or anything else for aging.Try again: