Hey cottonwood
Here is what I mean. The biggest problem facing wildlife in many midwestern states in a loss of habitat. Look at any aerial photography from any county in Iowa for the last 30 years and you will typically see a huge degredation of habitat. Every year an Army of excavators and dozers are clearing more habitat for farmland. I AM NOT BLAMING THE FARMERS, I understand they have to make a living on tight margins and it is their land to do what they want. But the result is not good for hunting. Also, farmers that still have habitat are realizing more and more that selling hunting leases is very profitable. So although some still allow others to hunt their property for free, it is becoming more and more rare. And don't forget about the urban sprawl.
So, having landowners(REC land) that are hunters helps provide food and habitat that benefits deer, turkey, pheasants, and quail in a large radius outside that property.
Now, are there some that do high fence, are there some who hog large tracks all for themselves, of course. But I believe that most have a net positive impact on the surrounding area when compared to houses and BIG AG. Even better, if you can get a few neighboring, landowning hunters to work together with agreeing on good QDM, the result is a force multiplier for hunting miles around. Just think what happens when neighbors agree to go from "brown and down" to self regulated age restrictions for harvesting bucks and managing doe populations. Educating landowners and hunters is the key to success IMO.
All the arguing about rifle cartidges, crossbows, season dates, party hunting, etc is void when the habitat is permenantly removed. Areas I hunted as a kid in the 80's haven't seen a deer or pheasant in a long time now largely because the timber, fencerows, hedges and waterways are gone.
2 cents