Anytime anyone mentions license fee increase the is a huge stink about it and I don't get it. If the funds were 100% dedicated to hunting, trapping and fishing, I would support it in a big way. Personally, I would like DNR officers added so that there is one per county.
Hunting has a low cost of entry compared to most other recreational sports. You don't NEED fancy camo, expensive blinds, the latest and greatest bow. You can get into in pretty cheap. From there you can buy a tag and get days and weeks and months of entertainment out of it.
Compare that to other outdoor recreational activities. a round of golf, say $40 EACH TIME. go skiing.... $60 for the DAY, etc.
I am for finding a way for other activity goers to contribute (hikers, mountain bikers, bird watchers, etc) to using recreational areas, but I would also support license increases with a GUARENTEE they were not dumped into the general fund and used ONLY for hunting, fishing, trapping. I seem to be in the minority from comments I see.
What are others thoughts?
Hunting has a low cost of entry compared to most other recreational sports. You don't NEED fancy camo, expensive blinds, the latest and greatest bow. You can get into in pretty cheap. From there you can buy a tag and get days and weeks and months of entertainment out of it.
Compare that to other outdoor recreational activities. a round of golf, say $40 EACH TIME. go skiing.... $60 for the DAY, etc.
I am for finding a way for other activity goers to contribute (hikers, mountain bikers, bird watchers, etc) to using recreational areas, but I would also support license increases with a GUARENTEE they were not dumped into the general fund and used ONLY for hunting, fishing, trapping. I seem to be in the minority from comments I see.
What are others thoughts?