I am rooting for Mel to keep the title. Taking a mature buck off the ground, with a recurve, and have it be a 204" typical???? Talk about everything having to be perfect...
I could go either way on that.
Back when Mel was hunting, there probably wasn't the hunting pressure we see today. I walk the fence at one property and I see tree stands on every adjoining parcel. In such areas, tough for deer to get BIG.
The flip side is people today who control vast tracts of ground, plant tons of food plots and essentially farm the deer like livestock. Is that a fair comparison to what Mel faced?
Either way, records are made to be broken or we wouldn't "keep score".
Sounds like Iowa now....Back then they were lucky to see a few deer a week...
I think what Hunt Iowa is saying is this could be the only picture we ever see of him. Obviously he has been measured once and will be measured again but we may never know the real story.
My guess is Field and Stream was the first to blink. Is it applying pressure on the hunter to share the story. They obviously couldn't get it, so they slightly went around it.
What's everyone think about that? He doesn't have to share his story. It's my understanding that this possibly could happen. Myself, I understand both sides of the issue. I respect the hunter either way. Myself, I would share. For some reason by not, just creates suspicion but maybe not.
Thoughts?
Anybody hear of the 190" typical killed during bow season in Marion County?
If I was to harvest one of that caliber I would probably share, but that would be after there was some new security devices installed. Up here in small town Iowa its still a pretty much safe place to live, but all of that can go by the wayside when someone see's an opportunity to make a quick chunk of change. The Andrews buck from Independence is the one that comes to mind right away. No matter what you wouldn't be able to keep it a complete secret and you shouldn't want to anyway. That deer deserves to be seen as it is an amazing animal, but with that comes alot of jealousy, greed, pressure, and other things.I think what Hunt Iowa is saying is this could be the only picture we ever see of him. Obviously he has been measured once and will be measured again but we may never know the real story.
My guess is Field and Stream was the first to blink. Is it applying pressure on the hunter to share the story. They obviously couldn't get it, so they slightly went around it.
What's everyone think about that? He doesn't have to share his story. It's my understanding that this possibly could happen. Myself, I understand both sides of the issue. I respect the hunter either way. Myself, I would share. For some reason by not, just creates suspicion but maybe not.
Thoughts?
Oh no here we go...I have not heard a wisper about this deer. But if you got some time to waste and want a good read go to archery talk and read the giant thread about the Ohio buck a guy post on Nov 23. It looks to gross like 230 typical and its alive, or so they say. Poster seen the deer a few time and another guy watched it in the summer but it moved some distance. It looks to survived the gun season and well the ending is not over. If that buck gets shot it will ruin Ohio with its current laws.
http://www.ohiosportsman.com/forum/showthread.php?p=678694&posted=1
http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=2135056
In the Big Buck contest scored 196Not me, I haven't heard about it. A few big non-typical's but not a big beautiful typical scoring that! Love to see it!