Size could be in any perspective - little could be 40 acres and big could be 200 OR maybe some folks would say little is 200 and big is 2,000 acres- WHATEVER. I guess, let's say little is 10-120 acres. BIG is say 250 or bigger. You could come up with your own example.
My QUESTION- would you rather own a bunch of small pieces all over the place (still relatively close for driving) where you could jump around, move the pressure, hunt different deer OR would you rather have ONE big piece big enough to accomodate you- you could manage the herd to some degree, pass far more deer to maturity, etc. Obviously there's countless ups and downs to both those scenarios and I don't want to throw out my point of view there yet because i'm curious your take. What do you all think, what do you prefer?
My QUESTION- would you rather own a bunch of small pieces all over the place (still relatively close for driving) where you could jump around, move the pressure, hunt different deer OR would you rather have ONE big piece big enough to accomodate you- you could manage the herd to some degree, pass far more deer to maturity, etc. Obviously there's countless ups and downs to both those scenarios and I don't want to throw out my point of view there yet because i'm curious your take. What do you all think, what do you prefer?