Potential Wisconsin record breaker

[LYON]

Whether it breaks the typical archery record or not, it's a sweet deer! http://morningmoss.com/potential-wisconsin-state-record-archery-typical-buck-shot/

 

[bradley]

There is no tag on it in the picture in the dark the dnr better recover the deer & the gear used to take it!LOL

 

[HorseDoctor]

I'm guessing too many "de-ducks" to break 189 3/8 net, but sweet critter all the same!

 

[Team Haastyle]

There is no tag on it in the picture in the dark the dnr better recover the deer & the gear used to take it!LOL

Hate to this to you bradley, but the right base has the Wisconsin metal tag that replaces the tag. Those get put on when we go register our deer.

On a side note, I also agree that is a crazy deal that the other post talks about regarding the IDNR taking deer away without having a tag on it.

 

[4 Buck]

Heck of a deer!

 

[KnuckleDragr]

Now those are some heavy beams!

 

[iabwhntr]

I'd pass on it since it wasn't the deer I targeted for the year

 

[JakeWym]

Real gem right there, no matter what it scores. Congrats to the hunter!

 

[Highmark]

Stud! Congrats to the hunter.

 

[Thinkin Rut]

I'm guessing too many "de-ducks" to break 189 3/8 net, but sweet critter all the same!

The article said 202 net green score, unless they meant gross. Even a true gross score is after side to side deductions. Looks to be a new state record...congrats to him!

 

[JRudd]

The article said 202 net green score, unless they meant gross. Even a true gross score is after side to side deductions. Looks to be a new state record...congrats to him!

gross is after deductions? maybe its just me but am i missing something here?

great deer, and congrats to the hunter! but i wouldnt imagine that deer over mid to high 170, maybe low 180 net. maybe he just looks smaller in pictures than he really is?

i just looked again, the caption below the picture said gross green score. i ddint read the artical again tho