Buck Hollow Sporting Goods - click or touch to visit their website Midwest Habitat Company

Press Release from Farm Bureau & Gov. Town Meetings

ElkHunter

Life Member
Great choice of words "stabilize"
My choice might have been decimate in many counties, but hey I look at things differently.

Branstad Intervenes to Stabilize Upcoming Deer Harvest

5/13/2011 12:36:56 PM
Rick Robinson

By Dirck Steimel, Iowa Farm Bureau Spokesman Editor

After hearing a wide range of concerns by a new coalition of Farm Bureau and other groups interested in the size of the Iowa deer herd, Gov. Terry Branstad last week instructed the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to revise its original plan which would have significantly reduced antlerless deer licenses in the 2011-12 hunting season.

The coalition also includes the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Soybean Association, the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS), the Iowa Insurance Institute and the Iowa Nursery and Landscape Association.

The coalition raised concerns that a reduced deer harvest would result in increased damage to field crops, as well as, horticultural crops, forests and other private property. The coalition also said that a higher deer population could hinder economic development and would likely raise the number of deer-vehicle accidents in Iowa. The likelihood of deer-vehicle accidents in the state is already the second highest in the nation, according to a recent insurance company study.

Antlerless Deer Quota Unchanged

At its May meeting the Iowa Natural Resources Commission, which sets state hunting rules after reviewing recommendations from the DNR, approved a Branstad-approved plan that would keep the upcoming antlerless deer harvest quota unchanged from the 2010-11 total. The commission, however, added language to a revised notice of intended action that also instructed the DNR to accept additional comments on last year’s harvest quota before it makes a final ruling at its July 14 meeting.

However, Rick Robinson, IFBF environmental policy advisor, says it’s his understanding that the additional language added by the NRC will not be supported by the Governor’s office.

"This makes it important for farmers to continue to make comments on the number of deer they see on their farms and in their counties," he said.
In March, the DNR had proposed reducing the number of antlerless deer licenses in 35 counties of the state for a total reduction of 23,500 during the 2011-12 season. The antlerless deer licenses are a primary method that the DNR uses to reduce the number of does and control each county’s overall deer population.

The DNR explained in March that the harvest of antlerless deer could be reduced because the state’s deer population was under control in a large part of Iowa.

Deer Population Larger Than Management Goal

But a new coalition countered that the DNR currently projects the statewide deer population remains 5 to 10 percent above the department’s management goal of a post-harvest population of 170,000 to 200,000 head. That is approximately the size of the population in the mid-to-late 1990s. The coalition members also expressed concern that the DNR planned to reduce the antlerless harvest in several counties where many citizens believe the population remains too high. Some of the proposed reduction in licenses would be in the northeast counties, including Clayton, Winneshiek, Allamakee and Fayette, which have some of the state’s highest deer populations.

The preliminary plan, “would be the largest one-year reduction in deer tags in recent history,” the coalition said in its May 10 letter to Branstad. “Iowa hunters and antlerless tags play a vital role in controlling Iowa’s deer herd. It is critical that we use this tool as effectively as possible.”

The coalition also noted to Branstad that the state has yet to implement all of the recommendations made to the 2009 session of the Iowa Legislature by a 16-member deer study committee. “We encourage you and your staff to review these and discuss them with the DNR director. It seems a progress report by the department to all Iowans is in order before final decisions are made on this year’s hunting rules,” the coalition wrote.

In addition, the coalition recommended that the DNR meet annually with a deer study committee and other stakeholders to review progress in managing the deer herd and recommendations for future actions.

The NRC will give its final approve to the 2011-12 resident deer hunting rule at its July 14 meeting in Windsor Heights.

For those who live in NE Ia. you might want to attend town hall meetings.
Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds
announce town hall meeting tour

(DES MOINES) –Gov. Terry E. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Kim Reynolds today announced they will be holding a series of town hall meetings across Iowa.

The following events are free and open to the public:

Monday, May 23, 2011

3:30 p.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Chickasaw County town hall meeting
Chicakasaw Community Centre
301 N. Water Ave.
New Hampton, IA

5:30 p.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Howard County town hall meeting
C US Bank – Grange Hall
111 North Elm Street
Cresco, IA

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

10 a.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Allamakee County town hall meeting
Farmers and Merchants Savings Bank - Basement
201 W. Main Street
Waukon, IA

12:30 p.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Clayton County town hall meeting
Johnson’s Restaurant
916 High Street NE
Elkader, IA

2:30 p.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Fayette County town hall meeting
Luigi’s Restaurant
1020 South Frederick
Oelwein, IA

4 p.m. Gov. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Reynolds hold Buchanan County town hall meeting
Independence Senior Center- Main Dining Area
400 5th Avenue NE
Independence, IA

For more information please visit www.governor.iowa.gov.
 
I guess I am going to have to buy up as many antlerless tags as I can this fall and make sure they all get filled......;) Ya know do my part to reduce the herd.........
(Need a damn sarcasm font)
 
Last edited:
Typical battle between those that like the deer and those that don't... we lost this one so far. The Govenor doesn't seem to see eye-to-eye with Iowa hunters and the DNR. What is it going to take to change his mind? How many people are going to have to contact him? Who else do we have on our side besides the DNR?
 
I would strongly urge the rest of you guys in NE Iowa to attend. I will either be at the Allamakee meeting or the Clayton depending on my schedule that day. The more of us that show our faces and provide factual evidence the better off we are. If the Hunter is not represented at these, you know the farmer will be, and that is not good for us. This blows! Im really starting to dislike this dude :thrwrck:
 
typical battle between those that like the deer and those that don't... We lost this one so far. The govenor doesn't seem to see eye-to-eye with iowa hunters and the dnr. What is it going to take to change his mind? How many people are going to have to contact him? Who else do we have on our side besides the dnr?

peta.......
 
Welcome back to the '70's gang......where you had a good season if you just saw a deer......any deer!
 
I would like to know how the deer population "hinder economic development"? What, is the deer herd going to outbid you on the land to put your new business? If anything you would think that the money we hunters put into our communities and communities that we hunt in would help the economy.
 
Farming income has a much bigger bite when it comes to decisions. What about farmers getting a % out of the permit sales so they also see some value in deer and wildlife in general? May lead to them being more tolerant since their bottom line is not hurt nearly as bad?
 
PETITION. Someone needs to create an online petition. These political clowns are wrong and typical political garbage with $ involved.
 
PETITION. Someone needs to create an online petition. These political clowns are wrong and typical political garbage with $ involved.

I don't think that'll amount to much.



Going to these town hall meetings and other direct contacts with Brandstad is going to be imperative.

I guess we'll find out how much our deer hunters want this. Find a meeting and be heard.
 
If corn and bean prices moderate and less govt money for programs...who knows how low rec ground could go. It could be a buying opportunity of a lifetime.

It's a buying opportunity NOW. Look at other states and compare prices. You'll see double or triple prices in many states for this type of land. Sure, go to MO where hunting sucks & Nov 12 rifle season OR go west where ground quality goes WAY DOWN & you'll see cheaper BUT go anywhere else and it's FAR FAR higher. I've heard for 10 years we'll see $500/acre ground.... Not happening.
Now, on the other side of that, if NRLO changes happen- look for $3-5k ground within a year. If economy comes back strong, look for $3k+/acre for good hunting stuff. I'm NOT saying either will happen BUT who knows?!? I will bet my life that we don't see prices cut in half for example- I don't care if we have the Great Depression #2. Of course NOTHING is 100% and almost everything in life is a gamble BUT if it were me- I'd be buying land. Interest rates AROUND record lows. Yes, land may dip if interest rates hit 10% but land could also go up because inflation. I'm getting WAY TO DEEP INTO THIS so I'll stop BUT I'll be buying more land and if the world falls apart- oh well. Life's a risk & I'll bet on land anytime. Just my OPINION.

***Ag ground & Rec ground are 2 totally different animals. Both can affect each other BUT have 2 different driving forces. Ag ground is at record highs right now (you think it's smart to buy at record highs??? I don't) BUT rec ground is a discounted rate due to the economy- Rec ground is not a priority for many. Ag ground may go down (who really knows?!?! I think it will) but if economy turns around (SOMEDAY it will) Rec ground will go up. IMO.

****Sorry I got so off topic. Folks here need a dang good game plan on dealing with these issues. I feel bad for my buddies in the northern 2/3rd's of the state.
 
Last edited:
Same thing happened in MI where I moved from. Sad to see it followed me here. $$$ talks..Lucky to see a deer in a week, when I left. Friends say is still the same,,up there, North part of MI.Guess hunting license revenue not as great as other sources. See No Deer, hunting license purchase will go down..DNR cut backs will continue.But,,as I heard on local Radio. "Only Good Deer, are Dead Deer".
 
Out of one side of the politician’s mouth “deer populations are an economic detriment” and out of the other side of the same mouth "deer are an economic boon”.

Guess it depends on which group they are talking to, farmers and insurance companies or farmers who want to sell their tags and the restaurants that want to feed the people who buy the transferable tags. And in the mean time the true conservationists are sitting in the corner being punished by the buck$ over biologist mentality of special interest group funded political agendas and the officials they helped elect.
 
Transferrable tags? Are you kidding me? What a joke, sounds like you've borrowed some of our Kansas politicians here lately...
 
Skip...My question to you is, if there were no whitetails in Iowa would rec land prices stay the same? Branstad in short told the DNR to sit down and shut up and that Branstad and FB were calling the shots. Unless something changes, you are at the mercy of FB dictating what the acceptable number of deer is for the state. My guess it's way closer to zero than where we are right now. With every year that Branstad and FB is a team the quality of deer hunting will go down. With the quality of deer hunting down so will the demand for the rec ground be down. Like everything else, supply and demand will determine price. If the Branstad-FB team continues, IMO rec land will see $1000 an acre before $3000. Let's hope we can derail it.
 
If there's no deer, sure, ground prices for "deer land" will be garbage. BUT, that's not going to happen, there will always be "SOME" level of deer. I see HORRIBLE levels of deer on some areas in WI that still command 3-4k an acre.
In many areas of IA, this is really hurting the folks and deer #'s are WAY TOO LOW and FAR FAR LESS THAN CARRYING CAPACITY. The great part about buying land.... you have SOME control on deer populations. If government wants all these rascals gone, many folks would just load up their farms with food and keep many deer safe by not killing them. Land ownership is about the only way to SOMEWHAT insulate yourself from horrible regs. BUT- that's a smaller group of folks AND you get into HOW MUCH LAND it's gonna take to have some effect.
To be honest with you, I have a nice size piece of land and I'll by-pass most of this GARBAGE. I sure can't dictate my neighbors BUT I can make up for bad decisions, neighbors and regs to a pretty high degree. Folks will always be able to do that to SOME degree with land. The whole LAND discussion is really complicated, lots of angles, depth and driving forces- long story short in regards to land: no matter what - I'll be buying more and I feel now is a better time to buy than 3 years ago, even with this issue at hand. That last part ABSOLUTELY is OPINION and SPECULATION- which most ANY business, $, investment issue is to some degree.

Regulations BY FAR are so much bigger than any landowner or group of guy's desires though. This is BAD news, no question. Our state, our land and our herd are and will continue to suffer in MOST areas if folks don't get real organized and loud about this.

Easy now Skip, the hunting is not IA, but not quite that bad. :grin:
BUSTED! :) Sorry, that wasn't very nice of me. MO has some gorgeous land and would be close to as good as IA if it did the SIMPLEST thing and moved RIFLES 3 weeks down the line in the calendar.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom