Score this ten

[203ntyp]

147", no mass or enough width to get into the 150's?

 

[SaskGuy]

I looked at those reference points and I'm still saying 168. I don't think you need width to get a buck to score high. I for one have shot a 180" buck with a 16 and change spread. Here's a Canadian buck that goes 186 with a spread under 12".

 

[Thinkin Rut]

Thanks for the pictures Iowa1. Even though pictures can be misleading, I think you could take off about 8 inches of mass and 2 inches of spread comparing these bucks to the trail camera buck. I guessed him in the mid 160's. Maybe my 12 year old will get a shot at him tomorrow. Thanks to all for the input!

 

[Shredder]

With estimations of a 16 inch spread and 26 inches of mass...both very conservative, I still come up with 159 and a deceptive angle. Let us know the score when he goes down.

 

[Steve-O]

That is not even fair saskguy! Why do you got to do that to us down here

 

[Scott]

I would guess at least 34 inches of mass. The more I look at him the closer to 170 he gets. Those 4's are gonna add some inches.

 

[sureshot]

He's in the 170's. My uncle shot a ten a lot like that two years ago that went 176 with only a 16in. spread. Good luck with him.

 

[letemwalk]

I don't know what he'd score (165-ish?) but I know I'd shoot him in a hearbeat! Good luck with him.