[ QUOTE ]
Folks,
I think its interesting that nearly every state DNR caters to the lowest denominator. They set their license fees as low as possible in order to sell as many hunting & fishing licenses as possible.
As a result, your avid hunter/fisher buys a license (of course), but so does the occasional, "weekend," & "once every other year" hunter/fisher.
These "marginal" hunters/fishers don't do anything to support hunting & fishing other than to buy a license. They are not avid & they are not passionate.
On the contrary, nearly everyone on this website is likely both avid & passionate.
I have learned over the years that the avid & passionate are willing to pay a lot more for their passions. Obviously, no one wants to pay more for anything! But if the payment means better hunting/fishing, less intrusion by other hunters/fishers, etc., etc., they are usually willing to pay more money versus quit hunting/fishing.
I have long suggested that state DNR's STOP catering to the lowest denominator. Instead, they should increase license fees so that they finally have the budget necessary to buy more public land & provide better hunting/fishing. Who really cares if the lowest common denominator stops hunting/fishing?
Mick
[/ QUOTE ]
Sounds like someone didn't get the buck he was after last year, or doesn't have a place to hunt, so he has to deal with the other public land hunters who are not as passionate as he is.