Cedar, where I have I said I wanted the regs changed?? Look, I've been a NR landowner for awhile, know many NR landowners, as well as R landowners. The folks I know come from low, middle and high incomes and own different amount of acreages. The only issue I commented on was the NR landowner with a lot of acreage, which is not me. I'm fine with the status quo. I don't consider myself a "poor NR".Didn't I say that!?!?
I think some guys see a NR post and immediately think it's some undercover attempt to push for changes. I stated my situation, didn't have to, and get questioned. I'm being honest when I say I have been all over the board on this issue, but after being a part of this site since 2003, hunting in Iowa for several years, meeting NR's and R's alike I believe the regs should remain the same. I don't agree with the anysex license fees for NR's. The DNR is taking advantage of how popular Iowa hunting has become, which on one hand many R's don't like because of the NR influx, but will say "we should charge more", which will guarantee only wealthy NR's will be in Iowa over time. But that's a whole other debate.
I think some guys see a NR post and immediately think it's some undercover attempt to push for changes. I stated my situation, didn't have to, and get questioned. I'm being honest when I say I have been all over the board on this issue, but after being a part of this site since 2003, hunting in Iowa for several years, meeting NR's and R's alike I believe the regs should remain the same. I don't agree with the anysex license fees for NR's. The DNR is taking advantage of how popular Iowa hunting has become, which on one hand many R's don't like because of the NR influx, but will say "we should charge more", which will guarantee only wealthy NR's will be in Iowa over time. But that's a whole other debate.
Last edited: