the pain iowa is feeling & hunters who understand what even 10-15 years ago was like- it’s tough to see our trajectory down. Like all/most have said: it’s a big combo of being more lethal, gazillion new technologies on top of population in half & ehd outbreaks.
We are hurting. Other states have been in the toilet for 15-50 years so any improvement is a positive. KS & IA sat on a pedistal of greatness after IL fell off a cliff for their perfect $hit storm of all these bad things happening & their awful choices/changes…. Ruined & RUINED FOR ALMOST EVERYONE. Almost nothing GOOD changed in IL in last 25 years - on every metric (accept maybe the rich) - the herd & hunters got ravaged.
Now IA & KS have both had their states hurt, degraded & their resource damaged to some level - no doubt about it. Nothing like IL or others but we’ve been hurt.
So- all agree- things have gotten worse, not better. What else do we all agree on? Ehd & population are probably tops, followed with millions of new ways to kill & be extremely effective. In my mind, 60-65% of the battle is the population & ehd. I think there’s a strong case that we have way too liberal of means to kill after that. It’s a huge component. Bucks in the 2-4 year old range can be targeted & killed with ease. 5-7 year olds: much harder but they are simply becoming so much more rare that those bucks aren’t really thought of in the debate… & if they exist & get shot “hey great, you shot a MATURE buck!”…..
If we get to a stage where all/most the 2-4 year olds get shot- we are in DEEP trouble. We need reforms. This benefits NO ONE & truly hurts everyone. There’s zero merits or upside to “not having older deer”. It hurts the resource & our whole “hunting ecosystem” to kill the best young bucks - it ruins states on countless levels. Having older deer/balance - It’s what makes iowa special and “still good”. One of the last great places that isn’t destroyed! If we lose that- we lose iowa. I’m not saying we are there or can’t recover. I’m saying we cannot allow things to stay down & if we do cross that line where things stay down & “most” the 2-4 year olds get wiped out- we ABSOLUTELY need to change course.
Im thinking out loud here & honest as I can be…I go back & fourth hearing debate & listening to any side that justifies letting things get worse or not giving SOMETHING UP.
Can we agree with this in very short simplicity???…. If things stay “down” & continue to get worse… for example: our age class & bucks continue to crater or our population stays devastated around a lot of regions of state. Or generically: Hunting starts to look a lot more like the failed states (MI, MN, etc)…. Basically- can we agree that if we continue “down hill” …. and I’ll define that like this… we all “know it and see it” and I don’t need to put in to words what we all see going on out there…. We are hurting on countless levels & we all know it. If this stays or continues to get worse, can we all agree SOMETHING needs to change??? Less bucks, shorter seasons, LESS TECHNOLOGY, more conservative regs, WHATEVER. I guess my long winded rant is just summarized by saying- I think we will change course & I think things will get better. But Dag nab, if they get worse, we have to reign things in. We have to. The resource has no voice other than hunters on their behalf. & they for sure need some help.
We are hurting. Other states have been in the toilet for 15-50 years so any improvement is a positive. KS & IA sat on a pedistal of greatness after IL fell off a cliff for their perfect $hit storm of all these bad things happening & their awful choices/changes…. Ruined & RUINED FOR ALMOST EVERYONE. Almost nothing GOOD changed in IL in last 25 years - on every metric (accept maybe the rich) - the herd & hunters got ravaged.
Now IA & KS have both had their states hurt, degraded & their resource damaged to some level - no doubt about it. Nothing like IL or others but we’ve been hurt.
So- all agree- things have gotten worse, not better. What else do we all agree on? Ehd & population are probably tops, followed with millions of new ways to kill & be extremely effective. In my mind, 60-65% of the battle is the population & ehd. I think there’s a strong case that we have way too liberal of means to kill after that. It’s a huge component. Bucks in the 2-4 year old range can be targeted & killed with ease. 5-7 year olds: much harder but they are simply becoming so much more rare that those bucks aren’t really thought of in the debate… & if they exist & get shot “hey great, you shot a MATURE buck!”…..
If we get to a stage where all/most the 2-4 year olds get shot- we are in DEEP trouble. We need reforms. This benefits NO ONE & truly hurts everyone. There’s zero merits or upside to “not having older deer”. It hurts the resource & our whole “hunting ecosystem” to kill the best young bucks - it ruins states on countless levels. Having older deer/balance - It’s what makes iowa special and “still good”. One of the last great places that isn’t destroyed! If we lose that- we lose iowa. I’m not saying we are there or can’t recover. I’m saying we cannot allow things to stay down & if we do cross that line where things stay down & “most” the 2-4 year olds get wiped out- we ABSOLUTELY need to change course.
Im thinking out loud here & honest as I can be…I go back & fourth hearing debate & listening to any side that justifies letting things get worse or not giving SOMETHING UP.
Can we agree with this in very short simplicity???…. If things stay “down” & continue to get worse… for example: our age class & bucks continue to crater or our population stays devastated around a lot of regions of state. Or generically: Hunting starts to look a lot more like the failed states (MI, MN, etc)…. Basically- can we agree that if we continue “down hill” …. and I’ll define that like this… we all “know it and see it” and I don’t need to put in to words what we all see going on out there…. We are hurting on countless levels & we all know it. If this stays or continues to get worse, can we all agree SOMETHING needs to change??? Less bucks, shorter seasons, LESS TECHNOLOGY, more conservative regs, WHATEVER. I guess my long winded rant is just summarized by saying- I think we will change course & I think things will get better. But Dag nab, if they get worse, we have to reign things in. We have to. The resource has no voice other than hunters on their behalf. & they for sure need some help.

