Matthewfox_45
Well-Known Member
I make him grumpy skip! Sorry about that!CW - bit moody lately!!! U need to get outdoors & get some quality time out there!!! ICE knows where you are…. Behave, be nice & I’ll keep them off your back.
I make him grumpy skip! Sorry about that!CW - bit moody lately!!! U need to get outdoors & get some quality time out there!!! ICE knows where you are…. Behave, be nice & I’ll keep them off your back.
Good stuff CW!!! Kaboom!!!!
Your Honor…. May I approach the bench to clarify?
Ok, ok….. good catch & call…. I need to far better word that….
If u have them in ur truck - no. Not an issue & I did not word that well. Double concede to Iowaqdm as well….
What I’m saying is- when you’re pulled over with night vision, spotlight & rifle….after CO gets called, sees suspicion of crime, report or seeing use of them in an act, etc…. You cannot say “I’m shooting coyotes & coons” like every poacher is doing right now with thermals. You cannot shine them into fields with a weapon!!!!!! Thermals- you can right now.
So - correct & you are spot on - right now I can drive around with NV & a spotlight. The second I shine that spotlight at game ….. yes, even a coyote or a coon, during deer season - u would be done as THAT is illegal.
The law would put thermals in the exact same category as NV & spotlights. Which, again - yes, Simple possession is not an issue nor will it be with thermals if in same class. Use in the field during deer season “I’m just shooting coyotes & coons” could never fly. thermals were added to the list like NV & spotlights - during deer season, the scumbags that are using that as their loophole out wide scale & growing - is now gone.
Touché on the call out. CW the “Hammer” & soon to be “CW, Iowa’s Leading Criminal Defense Attorney”
I am not hurting my friends IMO. If I were- by definition - I’d then be helping my friends to legalize night vision & spotlights during deer season. My friends would have: 8 months of Thermal & NV hunting for coyotes, 12 months of normal scopes and all of trapping season. I want to HURT the poachers…. I want to take away their ability to exploit a massive gap in the law - when NV & spotlights were banned- thermals were not main stream. My Friends & every hunter have been GIFTED 50 gazillion new technologies to hunt or kill in the last 20 years - dialing a few things back will be just fine. You know who isn’t “just fine”? The resource…. some major obstacles the last 5-15 years & some things we urgently need to address.
Asked several legislators & CO’s 3 things…
1) if thermals were big then- would intention of law be to include them with NV & artificial light? Answer is always “absolutely would have been added” + “need to be”.
2) are thermals & them being left out of current law being widely exploited by poachers? “ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!”
3) are we pulling over known or highly suspected poachers & lose the bust due to “just shooting coyotes & coons?” “YES!!!” Often & all over the state. They literally have to be caught in the act or find the body. Makes it so much harder vs NV & spotlights.
Problem is just gonna get worse. & for my friends that like to thermal hunt in November that are deer hunters…. When thermal poaching gets worse or they can’t catch or ticket the guys they know are doing it cause it’s so difficult - maybe rethink this position. I’d bottom line it here: states like Missouri even caught this problem & outlawed all of the use inside deer season. Giving the coyote hunters the 8 months of using them + 12 months of regular scopes. Many other states got ahead of this.
Like any issue, and I mean ANY….. as hunters…. It’s often only about us. “You’re taking away from ME”. It’s never solely about the resource & protecting it. Even when massive abuses are taking place, resource is hurt & law enforcement is asking for our help. We still say no. Anything …. We say no. Legalize flame throwers for deer season…. Guys will buy em, burn our forests down & we will go “I think we need to make flame throwers for deer hunting illegal” & the group that bought flame throwers will flip out!!! That’s being crazy but apply it to anything…. 3 buck tags on 2 acres, straight wall rifles, Drones. Or heck, legalize the use of drones with a gun “it’s my right!!!!!” Or any other thing u can think of.
We Realize it’s an issue & cut off a problem before it gets out of hand & starts hurting the resource even worse…. Some Dudes are gonna flip out. & yes, many things in these polls ARE HURTING THE RESOURCE!!!!!!!!! To some in society, it’s only about “ME”. I just strongly advocate we don’t look at it that way & look at it through “whats best for the resource!” You know…. That resource EVERYONE ON HERE knows is hurting & has been hurt by a hundred cuts. THAT RESOURCE that is hurting enough to start a 45 page thread saying essentially “those good old days are in the mirror & need a lot of help”. We all know it. If the fragile resource had a voice- it would be asking to consider them & not just “me me me”. The resource I love & love hunting ….. I want them to get that relief. Get some wins in their favor for the first time in 20 years! “ME ME ME” - we will be just fine. The resource, future, new hunter, working man & next generation needs some major help. Need For us to consider some things beyond ourselves.
A neighbor to a farm I use to own in one of the most highly managed areas of Monroe county also owns land in the Amana colonies, we joked about why he would come down there to hunt because he killed way bigger bucks in the colonies. Also that area of Monroe county and where my current farm is in Decatur county have extremely high deer numbers and yet there are very few deer north of 170, same area 15-20 years ago consistently produced multiple 200s every year and deer numbers were drastically lower in that area back then. Difference nowadays is almost every farm in that area is now a deer farm and with technology and better weapons the deer virtually don’t stand a chance, bow season can still be a challenge but gun season is basically deer assassinations, not much hunting to it, 100% going to one buck would have that area producing giants again.My point is that in your area population might make the biggest difference but in other areas it will do absolutely nothing to help trophy quality. Everyone looks at this through their own lens and there truly is not one specific thing that’s gonna fix it.I understand what you think will happen by banning thermals. But it won’t stop the poaching. Just like you think one buck will somehow get top end bucks to age 6. It won’t happen. As Muskrat24 mentioned, at our current deer numbers none of these changes will change our trajectory. We know what happened in the Amana Colonies with one buck limit. High grading caused overall decline in high scoring bucks versus just outside where the limit was the same as the rest of Iowa. That is why they went back to Iowa’s current regulations.
I know you think banning thermals may save a few poached bucks, but at what cost. All the guys I know that thermal hunt coyotes kill the most right after harvest through February. From July 1 until crops are out guys don’t even try because crops are too tall, it’s too hot and too buggy. Coyotes are most vulnerable September, October and November when the pups are inexperienced and come to calling. I know guys that kill between 100-200 coyotes annually with thermals and 95% are killed between October and February. So thinking that those guys will just shift their coyote hunting from February through summer is very misguided.
I have seen numerous bucks recently still carrying both sides and driving around last Friday night I saw a stud still carrying both antlers. If I was a poacher he would’ve been easy to take as it was still daylight and he was under 100 yards from the road. My point is if someone wants to poach they can with or without thermals. They can before, during and after deer season.
So what about the resource??? Well studies done in Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota have all found fawn predation by coyotes account from 50% - 75% of all fawn mortality. Typically fawn survival rates to 8 months in those states is around 60%. So as you know I like numbers. If Iowa has 350,000 deer after season. 3 does to 1 buck means, 262,500 does left over. If we average 1.75 fawns per doe that means we will have 459,375 fawns hit the ground come Spring. If 60% survive to 8 months that equals 275,625. So fawn mortality will equal 183,750. If coyotes account for 50-75% of those deaths. That means coyotes will account for 91,875 to 137,812 fawn deaths. Just how many deer do you think are being poached by guys with thermals??? I mean how many could it really be 500??? 1,000??? What number of poached deer do you think justifies taking away the best 4-5 months to kill coyotes with thermals? Remember you are wanting to take away the months that they are the most vulnerable and when most thermal hunters want to go after them. This issues is no different than taking away buck tags. It is not about me, me, me. It is about what is best for the resource. We don’t need to take away buck tags and we shouldn’t be considering taking away the best months to thermal hunt the number one fawn predator. Especially, when our deer population has just been decimated by EHD. That would be the most counter productive move anyone could possibly be pushing. I mean it is almost equivalent to saying let’s increase the doe quota so we can take more deer off the landscape. I personally don’t own a thermal but I am thankful that there are lots of guys out there that do. I appreciate guys shooting coyotes and raccoons with them because both populations are out of control. I would be just fine with guys using NV or artificial lights and would support legalizing them for use on coyotes and raccoons year round, as well as other furbearing animals during their seasons. As far as I am concerned, if you are managing for deer, the only good coyote is a dead one.
As with any issue like this it is not just black and white. Some think it is and may even promote it that way but in actuality it isn’t. Changes like these have real consequences. You “might” save a few poached bucks but ultimately loose ten of thousands of fawns in exchange for those few bucks. I think we need to leave thermal’s alone. If anything we should be introducing legislation to legalize NV and artificial lights for coyotes and raccoons year round and furbearing animals during their season.
Not all thermals have the ability to record. I also agree with you, I don’t think poaching with thermals is a big issue. Some neighborhoods maybe. (But those neighborhoods are also heavily patrolled and would be pretty risky). However, as a whole across Iowa’s landscape…no way. You’d hear about it and guys would be getting caught. If they shot and left them lay you’d hear about it. If they shot them and tried to retrieve the buck good chance they’d get caught and you’d hear about that. I haven’t heard of either situation.I'm not real 【 knowledge up】 on thermal scopes but do they not all have a " record" feature?
Perhaps somehow/ someway make it a law that t hey HAVE to have this feature and be used at all times while in use?
Killing a couple hundred coyotes outweighs a couple big bucks poached overall.
Just guessing but I'd bet there are WAY more deer killed over feed piles, 5 minute's after/ before legal time, then with thermals.
Personally, I don't think poaching with thermals is a big issue.
Game warden told me of 15 that were shot from the road last year and head hacked in a premo neighborhood right next to his house! Nobody is out patrolling at 2 am and cameras cover very little even if you run a ton of them. Would actually be extremely hard to catch someone if they just randomly killed deer in different areas, they get caught when they keep coming back to same places. Even then it’s difficult, he never caught those guys and he tried the whole season.Not all thermals have the ability to record. I also agree with you, I don’t think poaching with thermals is a big issue. Some neighborhoods maybe. (But those neighborhoods are also heavily patrolled and would be pretty risky). However, as a whole across Iowa’s landscape…no way. You’d hear about it and guys would be getting caught. If they shot and left them lay you’d hear about it. If they shot them and tried to retrieve the buck good chance they’d get caught and you’d hear about that. I haven’t heard of either situation.
Putting a camera on the road helps identify vehicles that come back day after day. Then at least the warden can investigate if a deer gets shot and left minus the rack..Still need a tag number though. It’s amazing just how many bad apples and poachers are out there!Game warden told me of 15 that were shot from the road last year and head hacked in a premo neighborhood right next to his house! Nobody is out patrolling at 2 am and cameras cover very little even if you run a ton of them. Would actually be extremely hard to catch someone if they just randomly killed deer in different areas, they get caught when they keep coming back to same places. Even then it’s difficult, he never caught those guys and he tried the whole season.
Yep.. Unfortunately not much can change overnight very easily. Sometimes defense is best. Preventing bad bills is still a win! A HUGE win most of the time. When good ideas are not completely thought out and support isn’t quite what we thought good people end up getting embarrassed and we could lose on bigger issues because of that. It’s a good thing laws are hard to change sometimes.The polls are great but as said a page or two ago the sample size is too small, about 70 people, and they are like minded. In the research world it’s a flawed study even though I agree with all of it.
The legislative session is in full swing. Any intent on presenting this to a rep or senator? If not we wait until next year? Or, some rules can be changed by the over seeing agency, DNR, in relation with already existing law that does not require legislative approval. We could be in that boat with some changes. For example , non residents not party hunting and the revocation of nrlo archery doe tags back in the day were rule changes that did not go through the legislature.
Again, what’s the plan?????
You can't compare data from 5-10 years ago to todays data and say " since harvest #'s aren't up that means cell cams don't make us more efficient hunters. The population #'s from 2010 up to 2026 are completely different.Not a target on you but in your joking tone I have a few legit questions. Many people have cited Indiana one buck being the saving grace there, how can they possibly have big bucks, because they allow cell cams on RTI, oh my? No one has answered this but as I have mentioned I have not gone back to look at who was on the bandwagon on this site last year but all the rage was mature bucks avoid cell cams, now this year cell cams kill all the big bucks. A lot of the argument about more effective killers because of all the technology goes by the wayside when we look at harvest data and Jace’s recent 40% of 1.5 yo old buck harvest. Our buck harvest really hasn’t increased by percentage over the years so how exactly are we being more effective on bucks? I’d like to see the numbers that support the claim. And Jace himself said we are in a balanced place right now on his recent podcast appearance. Hahaha. Last, as a lot of us recognize many (not all) of us on this site lean to trophy hunters. Let’s jump in average Joe’s shoes that 5+ years ago shot a nice 2.5 yo buck each year. Since then he bought a couple cell cams and put in a food plot and is now killing 140” 3/4 yo consistently and is ecstatic! Wonder how he would vote. (Joking here but…) maybe someone should support not hunting over food plots, I’m guessing that would save a lot of bucks too and make hunting a little harder for those that have food plots and mow down corn. Give QDM a hard time if you want, population fixes 3/4 of Iowa but several suggestions made on this post are from the quadrant of Iowa that must not face the same challenges.
I’m surprised 4 guys getting caught killing 4 200” deer with thermals hasn’t made the headlines or this site.
Not too different than a flashlight to me.. 20 years ago everybody would have thought it was ridiculous to jump in a plane and look for a wounded deer and then recover it and say “you got it” and people would consider it legal/legit. It didn’t happen.. ABSOLUTELY NO ONE thought that was acceptable. BTW thermal imaging has been in use with planes for a LONG TIME! Nobody did it!! We all knew that wasn’t legal!! Huge difference between walking around searching for wounded/dead game with enhanced lighting and scouting an entire area with an aircraft. They are not even close to the same! Yoder/Deer Drone Recovery can complain online and in all his ads as much as he wants. Dude is a con-man trying to blur the lines of scouting/hunting/recovery all for his own personal gain! Have you ever seen something about drones where they aren’t trying to sell you something? The old joke is the the guys who made the most money during the gold rush were the guys who sold the shovels.. why give more money to the salesman at the expense of ruining hunting? Where does the line between scouting/hunting/recovery begin and end?? Does it start at the trigger pull and end at the shot??.. nobody should be buying into this!Random thought, What about using a thermal scanner to help recover a deer?
Random thought, What about using a thermal scanner to help recover a deer?
Random FWIW factoid...I recently went on a guided elk hunt in New Mexico and after I shot my elk at very near last light one day we took up the track after waiting for I dunno, 20 minutes or so. Now, it is fairly dark. We were on good blood and I was paying more attention to the blood trail and trying to dodge overhead branches, etc, when the guide whips his "binoculars" up and says, "Animal". Huh? Sure enough, it was my elk...probably 40-50 yards ahead of us.Random thought, What about using a thermal scanner to help recover a deer?
I used mine on a late season track job. Shot a buck, went back and got lights and thermal scanner. Followed an excellent blood trail and bumped the deer. Should’ve been using the scanner…brought the scanner up and he looked in rough shape. Backed out and found him the next morning. I was hoping to use it to find blood, but too much stuff holds heat in the woods.Random FWIW factoid...I recently went on a guided elk hunt in New Mexico and after I shot my elk at very near last light one day we took up the track after waiting for I dunno, 20 minutes or so. Now, it is fairly dark. We were on good blood and I was paying more attention to the blood trail and trying to dodge overhead branches, etc, when the guide whips his "binoculars" up and says, "Animal". Huh? Sure enough, it was my elk...probably 40-50 yards ahead of us.
I didn't realize he was using a thermal to "track" the beast, but sure enough he was. Huh? I didn't think much about it at the time, but later I started to wonder a little about the impact of technology, etc. We would have found the beast moments later via the regular blood trail, but...I think it would be fair to say that it was found via a thermal.
Don't hate me!![]()
From an academic pov or from the outside - it doesn’t. When u live in this world 24/7 u grasp the reality of the situation- then u understand when it stops. The VAST majority of deer poaching happens in November. Maybe up to mid December.I’ve been out plenty been catching lots of fish.
Next question, why does poaching just end on January 10th? Bucks still have antlers so why would it be okay to hunt with thermals on January 11th but not Jan 10th?