SF 2002 Using purple marks for boundry lines/tresspassing

[Mike311]

It has been brought to my attention, in a round about way, by the sponsor of the bill that I was incorrect in my opinion about posting land. After I was more or less taken to the woodshed for my post, my link and my opinion I re-researched my research and realized that the link I had posted was from Iowa Code 2001. Even the Iowa Code 2017 was published before the bill was passed so here is a link to what the Governor actually signed and is inforce today:

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/LGE/87/Attachments/HF69_GovLetter.pdf

Please draw your own conclusions after reading what was signed and/or consult someone who knows a lot more than I do and that would be just about anybody.

Either way nice job following this stuff. This can be boring and tedious to follow so thanks.

 

[Fishbonker]

Passed out of Senate Judiciary Committee and will be eligible for debate and vote in the Senate.

 

[Fishbonker]

Renumbered to SF 2101 and is eligible for debate.

 

[arm]

I might have read right over it, but is one "notice" at say a field drive, the only notice required for the entire property?

Idk if something changed recently in MO but I've noticed a lot more purple paint on my last trip down a few weeks ago. Doesn't look attractive by any means

 

[Fishbonker]

Passed the Senate today. Amended for distance between purple marks and height on posts. There was also a change that reads to me like owners on both sides of the fence need to agree with using the paint? It's one of those things that I just don't know what the language actually means.