Like Ghost I'm pretty passionate in my feelings about shining and why it shouldn't be legal here in Iowa.
I've also learned to be realistic when dealing with issues and bills that end up in the House, so now I'm less prone to argue over something that's most likely going no where.
Here's last years discussion on
shining when House File 191 showed up.
From last winter when i met with Rep. Whitaker:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yesterday I had occasion to sit in on debate in the Iowa Senate which I found very interesting.
Later we met with our Rep. John Whitaker, who not only is a hunter but has ridden with local CO's and witnessed first hand what many of us already know...and some of you wish to deny.
CO's themseleves have been working with John to come up with regulations to either ban shining or limit it to the time before hunting seasons.
I can tell you right now that trying to convince John that it does not create a very very serious problem by allowing recreational shining during hunting season..you'll be wasting the "keystrokes"
</div></div>
This bill went nowhere even though John tried, too much opposistion from farmers and "people who like to take pictures of deer" (according to John)
It's all but impossible for CO's to fight poaching period, let alone with legal shining. If lights were illegal then they only have to concentrate on lights...cause' they would be out there illegally!
Anway...I/we have said all that in previous "passionate arguements"...so until I hear that a bill has a snowballs chance in he$$ of passing I'm not gonna get to worked up over it... /forum/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif