bkcrrtnps
Well-Known Member
That last statement couldn't be more true!
The Franz buck
- Thread starter Thinkin Rut
- Start date
-
- Tags
- None
- Status
That last statement couldn't be more true!
Elliotcreek
New Member
Like I said Big waste of money
ReinertsonTaxidermy
Well-Known Member
First of many nails in the coffin of this joke
Thinkin Rut
PMA Member
The DNR picked the wrong buck and the wrong hunter to enforce a flawed mineral law...it's really going to tarnish their image going forward. I wonder if this decision will have any impact on the outcome of the new mineral (baiting) bill.
CurtisWalker
Well-Known Member
So from what I know. He still won't get his buck back even if innocent.
Thinkin Rut
PMA Member
Where are you coming up with that??
meyeri
PMA Member
Glad justice was served in this case. I don't know Joe, but the TP guys involved are men of character so I believe Franz was truly innocent and the account he gave was correct. Franz had his ducks in a row and the IDNR officer overstepped his bounds and didn't follow protocol. Shouldn't have even made it as far as it did! It sucks that Franz had his name dragged in the mud and that he had to go to the lengths he did with this suit.
Like others said it's a shame the IDNR had to waste so much time and resources, when much better things could have been done.
Like others said it's a shame the IDNR had to waste so much time and resources, when much better things could have been done.
ReinertsonTaxidermy
Well-Known Member
This sentence sums up why Internet forums have gotten so ridiculous.
MNbuckhunter
Member
Unfortunately there is a lot of jealousy in the hunting world. Wish people would just congratulate one another as fellow sportsman. If that were the case, I believe there would be a lot more harvest photos being viewed. A few bad apples ruin it for most everyone.
Oct-Lull
Well-Known Member
As far as I am concerned if the court says not guilty I am done hearing about it. Mineral is the least important part of this whole hunt. I will say I still don't care for this guy and I have never met him. Franz buck .com is the reason. What a bunch of garbage. This is what gives us all a bad name. To me this is THE example of how not to act as a hunter. Pretty lame.
BDAHMS
Be here Now
I may be the minority- who
Knows. But as far as sharing your buck of a lifetime- that's one of the reasons I joined this site. I have ZERO interest in shooting a monster- alone- and keeping it hidden in my basement for no one to enjoy. If everyone did that we wouldn't have a harvest forum- or the big buck classic I enjoy every year. I'm a social guy- I share my trail camera pictures and harvests. Have nothing to hide and if someone ends up finding out where I hunt so be it. Not saying my thoughts are right but to each their own. I enjoy the outdoors with others- I absolutely enjoy sitting alone in a stand and witnessing the woods come alive- but I also enjoy taking others and having them enjoy the same thing. If I killed a buck of the franz buck caliber you can bet your you know what it will be shared. Not saying I will create a website- but it will Absolutely be shared - Haters welcome
Knows. But as far as sharing your buck of a lifetime- that's one of the reasons I joined this site. I have ZERO interest in shooting a monster- alone- and keeping it hidden in my basement for no one to enjoy. If everyone did that we wouldn't have a harvest forum- or the big buck classic I enjoy every year. I'm a social guy- I share my trail camera pictures and harvests. Have nothing to hide and if someone ends up finding out where I hunt so be it. Not saying my thoughts are right but to each their own. I enjoy the outdoors with others- I absolutely enjoy sitting alone in a stand and witnessing the woods come alive- but I also enjoy taking others and having them enjoy the same thing. If I killed a buck of the franz buck caliber you can bet your you know what it will be shared. Not saying I will create a website- but it will Absolutely be shared - Haters welcome
Ishi
PMA Member
The case is over and he was found innocent in the charges. Emotions have been pinned up for many since this story and charges started. So today would be good therapy for many on here so air it out and let's move on.
This doesn't change the fact that there are many bills going on that can change OUR hunting so get involved. I have said it before the days of keeping our heads in the sand are over its all political these days which is very sad. So start sending them emails and lets try to fix this mess.
This doesn't change the fact that there are many bills going on that can change OUR hunting so get involved. I have said it before the days of keeping our heads in the sand are over its all political these days which is very sad. So start sending them emails and lets try to fix this mess.
6x6
PMA Member
Good post, agreed
Bowhunter500
Member
Totally agree with this. You he to enjoy the sport, for the sport, not to necessarily drop. Large caliber buck every season. If you can do that, props to you. However, this season I was able to get out and shoot a doe late season muzzy with my brother and shoot a doe. A measly doe, but I had a blast taking my older either and introducing him to the sport. If we are all jealous, we will never share. BDAHMS is correct, that's what these sights are for. I would love to put a deer of that size in the ground. However some people see that deer and see dollar signs to sell such a mount to an outfitter. That's not the sport. The guy was found innocent, believe it or not, it's done and over with. So let's quit getting after one another's throats because of their beliefs. And for goodness sakes, leave the Bonker alone. He provided information with his $.02 behind it, and that's that. We are all entitled to our opinion. On a lighter note, turkey seasons coming... I plan on baiting them ???
Bowhunter500
Member
And nevermind my awesome typos, the iPhone doesn't allow me to see what I'm writing (stupid phone) haha
seven twenty
PMA Member
Nobody seems to realize that the officer is not the one who took this to court. All he did was conduct an investigation and present what he found to the county attorney. That is who filed charges. The CA should be getting the backlash from this.
Facts: Mr Franz did what he was told he could do by the officer.
Someone one else called in a complaint/report that something was illegal
The officer was obligated to investigate and did.
On the outside, things seemed a little off. IE: the plywood was purchased after the harvest date, when the officer investigated the sites, they weren't covered, etc etc
A lot of people are blaming the officer but he was just doing his job. Things were questionable and in the end, justice prevailed. Questionable cases are presented to the court every day and people aren't this outraged. Hell, my coffee was hot and burnt me today. Maybe I should sue.
Facts: Mr Franz did what he was told he could do by the officer.
Someone one else called in a complaint/report that something was illegal
The officer was obligated to investigate and did.
On the outside, things seemed a little off. IE: the plywood was purchased after the harvest date, when the officer investigated the sites, they weren't covered, etc etc
A lot of people are blaming the officer but he was just doing his job. Things were questionable and in the end, justice prevailed. Questionable cases are presented to the court every day and people aren't this outraged. Hell, my coffee was hot and burnt me today. Maybe I should sue.
CurtisWalker
Well-Known Member
The DNR has a policy after 30 days of confiscation any items confiscated can remain in possession of the State even if the victim is found innocent. From what I was told. Hence why the buck still isn't back.
Bonkers just posted a bill that dealt with this subject.
Last edited:
TheMadCatter
Well-Known Member
I'm going to doubt that, that 30 day period thing is set in stone. If they do that then anybody who was innocent needs to get their stuff back too.
- Status