Buck Hollow Sporting Goods - click or touch to visit their website Midwest Habitat Company

2025-26 deer season change wish list

Increase of hunting and trespassing fines. This party hunting out of pickup windows loss of hunting rights 5 year loss. Packing multi hunting licenses for everyone you know jail time. The one buck limit is a good idea ,just good management of a resource.
 
My number one is stop feeding/baiting during the entire season stiff penalty’s if caught like 2 year License suspension.The number of people hunting corn piles is more than most think.
My number two would be go to one buck possibly a 2nd landowner tag. This would help increase access many people may share there spots once they are done for the year.
Number three shorter seasons. Our seasons were put in place way before all the increase in technology.
Number four, if the late antlerless season is deemed to be needed close all public land as I have never seen public land overpoPilates.
 
^^^, lots of good points.
Bottom line is, (with all states), this Big Buck " crap" has (killed) hunting as we knew it.
And yes, I'm guilty as hell myself.
 
With all due respect. I think some of you guys are being short sighted, maybe selfish and some just not thinking about the future of Iowa deer hunting. All you’re thinking about is wanting to shoot a bigger buck and I get it.

Our problem isn’t too many hunters, lack of deer or a lack of quality bucks. Our problem is declining habitat and access to private property. Decreasing the season by 10 days just concentrates hunters using public property or private land that is open to multiple people. This will lead to a diminished experience due to increased pressure. Which leads to people quitting the sport.

Let’s say we go to one buck plus 1 LO. Are you going to make the regular buck tag floating like the LO? If the tag isn’t a floating tag then you or your kids don’t get to do both bow and gun hunting. Now you just decreased their exposure to different types of hunting and their days afield and yours significantly. And what are you trying to accomplish? Save a few bucks?

You can’t control what happens on the neighbors property and you will never be able to save all the bucks on your property. All you can control is how many deer and more importantly what deer you kill.

The reality is more properties are being managed every year. Unfortunately there is also decreasing habitat. One guy is adding or improving his habitat and the guy across the fence is tearing his out. So the deer relocate to the property with the habitat. There is also less ground available each year because more people are trying to access the land that still has the habitat which leads to guys being displaced. Just think of how many dozers and excavators you have seen in a field with all the trees and brush piled up ready to burn and bury. The removal of habitat is not going to slow anytime soon.

Every year less kids are being introduced and taking up the sport. Every year there are less guys party hunting during shotgun. Instead of 5 guys pushing a half section now it is one guy sitting in a box blind overlooking a food plot. The other 4 guys quit because they lost access to the half section. All this is leading to less tags being sold. This leads to less revenue for the DNR.

What you’re going to accomplish with all these wishes is the exact opposite of what you’re hoping for. What will happen is there will be less tags sold which means less revenue coming into the DNR. This will force the DNR to push to increase license sales. First they will add crossbows to regular archery season to boost license sales. This will be detrimental to buck age structure and access. Then when the addition of crossbows doesn’t fix the budget issues they push to increase NR tags quotas to make up for the shortcomings.

Every NR tag purchased is equal to approximately 20 resident tags. So if they add 5000 additional NR tags that would offset approximately 100,000 less resident tags sold. Then with the increased NR tags allotments there will be increased leasing pressure and land purchases by outfitters. This will lead to decreased access to quality ground, increased recreational land prices, land fragmentation and ultimately decreased age structure just like it has for Illinois, Kansas, Ohio, Indiana, etc.

The DNR needs to sell tags to fund their department. With every resident hunter having one less opportunity to buy a buck tag that means one less resident tag sold. Not to mention each hunter will be in the field less days and therefore probably less likely buy an additional doe tag just incase they get an opportunity. Which will ultimately lead to even less revenue for the DNR. There will be some very detrimental consequences that you won’t be able to reverse if some of these wishes come true.

I would recommend just leaving things alone. Work to educate other hunters when the deer numbers are down due to EHD or over harvest. January antlerless seasons are a pain and I don’t like them but they are the DNR’s chosen tool in CWD areas to slow spread. (Which I don’t think does anything to slow the spread but that is another discussion). I would argue that the January antlerless season is better than sharp shooters shooting deer off corn piles like they do in Missouri. I would also argue that with the January antlerless season you still control what is being harvested versus a sharp shooter killing everything they can get a shot at over corn.

Again, you can only control what you are harvesting. Quit trying to change the regulations just because you didn’t get a chance at a 180” buck this year and do what you can to educate others about deer numbers and management practices.
So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?

That makes no sense ?

They’ve successfully harvested a buck, congratulations! If that’s not good enough for them, that’s a huge problem !
 
So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?

That makes no sense ?

They’ve successfully harvested a buck, congratulations! If that’s not good enough for them, that’s a huge problem !
Bingo!

You killed a deer, you hunted an entire season. Go fish, go shoot rabbits, go chase squirrels, go pheasant hunt, duck hunt…………we have all kinds of outdoor activities that can replace days afield.
 
Last edited:
^^^, lots of good points.
Bottom line is, (with all states), this Big Buck " crap" has (killed) hunting as we knew it.
And yes, I'm guilty as hell myself.
I would have to agree with you. From reading post on here and couple other websites. When folks are talking about managing a healthy deer herd, I get the feeling they're complaining more about not seeing bigger, older bucks. Hence the comments about the orange army's mentality if it's brown it's down. I'm picky and haven't shot a deer in two years now. Seen plenty, just not what I wanted to shoot. We decided not to shoot any doe this year. Saw good numbers, little less than previous, and several bucks. One guy did shoot a nice 9 that hunts on my brother's place.
 
I would have to agree with you. From reading post on here and couple other websites. When folks are talking about managing a healthy deer herd, I get the feeling they're complaining more about not seeing bigger, older bucks. Hence the comments about the orange army's mentality if it's brown it's down. I'm picky and haven't shot a deer in two years now. Seen plenty, just not what I wanted to shoot. We decided not to shoot any doe this year. Saw good numbers, little less than previous, and several bucks. One guy did shoot a nice 9 that hunts on my brother's place.
I think there is also an issue with soooo many "land managers" out there now. All going for older age class, big deer. If that's all the majority of people shoot anymore, there isn't enough to go around and we end up with less big deer to hunt. Highgrading I have heard it termed.
I tend to think you are somewhat better off not being in a neighborhood with so much management, as long as the neighbors aren't killing everything
 
The one thing I haven't seen listed which should be number one on every list is better education. The Majority has no idea that deer populations could be low. Most trust the DNR and feel like if there's tags available then there must be plenty of deer.

If you're serious about making our heard more mature....

1. Get rid of cell cams. These are a joke . I'm guessing over 70% of hunters utilize them to decide what stand to go to. I know a couple really nice buck shot this year that way.

2. Crossbows only during muzzle loader season.
Crossbows are routinely abused like cell cams. They should be restricted to the muzzleloader seasons.

3. If you want to ban straight wall cartridges and smokeless ml then you should ban compound bows also. Which I'm fine with with all 3.


It's really clear above who owns land and who have never had out of state guys buy up all the land they grew up hunting. A lot of us have spent the last couple of decades just struggling to find places to hunt more and more and more people just quit hunting The ones controlling all the land are going to eventually get burned when hunting numbers are too low to have a voice.
 
So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?

That makes no sense ?

They’ve successfully harvested a buck, congratulations! If that’s not good enough for them, that’s a huge problem !
You guys just don’t get it. It’s not about shooting a buck. It’s not about shooting two bucks! It’s about having opportunities to be afield. Shortening the season or taking away a tag is not going to help recruit kids or retain current hunters. Kids aren’t recruited by killing a buck. Hell, I can take any kid that can hit a paper plate at 100 yards and have them harvest a buck in less than 2 hours. We’ll climb into one of my box blinds at 3:30 pm and by 5:30 pm they can have one laying on the ground. If you think that will make them a lifelong deer hunter you’re crazy. If you knew how many times I have made one of my kids pass a deer just so they would have to spend more time hunting you wouldn’t believe me. Why… because of all the other things they would have missed by being done so quick.

This year I spent my whole November sitting with my 9 year old hunting for his first bow deer. I watched him pass a nice 150” 3 1/2 at 10 yards, a nice 140” 2 1/2 at 10 yards, Numerous other 2 1/2 and 1 1/2 year old bucks at under 15 yards. He ended up taking a big 5 1/2 year old cull buck. He got to watching that buck push a hot doe a hundred yards down a field edge. The hot doe stopped to urinate at 25 yards. The buck came over to test the urine and lip curled. Then the buck grunted and pushed the doe by us at 15 yards. I grunted to stop the buck. My son made the shot. The buck made it just under 100 yards. My son’s reaction was priceless as the bucks legs started to give out and he dropped into the draw just out of sight. That is when my son’s legs started to give out and the adrenaline dump started. I guarantee at age 9 he put in more hours in the stand this Fall than most bowhunters in Iowa. And passed bucks that 90% of the bowhunters in Iowa wouldn’t have.

If he would have killed the first buck that got in range he would been done the first sit. How does that build a love for the sport? How does that allow him to witness the rut and deer interactions? How does that teach him about being a good manager of the resources? How would he have gotten to experience how the other animals live and act? So he filled his bow tag and then ate his other tag because he didn’t get a chance at the other cull bucks on farm. So what would taking away a tag have done other than taking away days afield??? What does taking away a tag from anyone actually do??? Absolutely nothing!!! I guarantee it will not lead to more 180” deer. It will cause the problems I posted in my previous post.

If he would have shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had another tag he would have missed seeing a squirrel fall 25’ out of a tree when the branch he jumped to broke. He would have missed seeing two raccoons fighting over the last spot in a den hole tree one morning. He would have missed seeing 20 turkey pitch out of the trees and land in the timber around him. He would have missed seeing a covey of quail flush at his feet walking into a stand one afternoon. He would have missed hearing and watching rooster pheasants cackling and moving around the CRP at first light. He would have missed the chickadee that landed on the shooting rail of his stand and sat there looking at him trying to figure out what he was. That is just a few of the things he would have not experienced this Fall if he shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had a second tag.

There is so much more to recruiting kids or retaining adults to the sport than just congratulations you got a buck! If that is why you deer hunt I feel sorry for you. If that is how you brought your kids into the sport I feel sorry for them. If the only thing that matters to you is the size of your bucks rack I feel sorry for you. Being in nature and watching God’s creation is so much more important than “I got a buck”. Or “my buck scored 185 3/8”. Filling your tag should be the last thing you think about when hunting. That is what I teach my kids anyway. No pressure. Go out and have fun. Enjoy what God has created. If a mature buck comes by take your time, focus on the spot and squeeze the shot off. The tag in their pocket is the reason to get up and go out and experience it. That tag in their pocket is what helps them develop a love of the land and all our resources. Having the opportunity to bow and gun hunt just gives them additional opportunities to be afield. Additional opportunities to enjoy God’s creation. Because someday after killing enough big bucks they won’t be drawn to the outdoors for that reason. Hopefully when that time comes the love of the land and all of God’s creation will be. Then they will spend their November, December and January sitting in a stand passing that love on to their children. That is what recruits and retains lifelong hunters.

That is what will keep our hunting tradition going.
…Not congratulations you got a buck!
…Not congratulations your buck scored 185 3/8”.
…And certainly not Iowa going to a one buck State.
 
Last edited:
You guys just don’t get it. It’s not about shooting a buck. It’s not about shooting two bucks! It’s about having opportunities to be afield. Shortening the season or taking away a tag is not going to help recruit kids or retain current hunters. Kids aren’t recruited by killing a buck. Hell, I can take any kid that can hit a paper plate at 100 yards and have them harvest a buck in less than 2 hours. We’ll climb into one of my box blinds at 3:30 pm and by 5:30 pm they can have one laying on the ground. If you think that will make them a lifelong deer hunter you’re crazy. If you knew how many times I have made one of my kids pass a deer just so they would have to spend more time hunting you wouldn’t believe me. Why… because of all the other things they would have missed by being done so quick.

This year I spent my whole November sitting with my 9 year old hunting for his first bow deer. I watched him pass a nice 150” 3 1/2 at 10 yards, a nice 140” 2 1/2 at 10 yards, Numerous other 2 1/2 and 1 1/2 year old bucks at under 15 yards. He ended up taking a big 5 1/2 year old cull buck. He got to watching that buck push a hot doe a hundred yards down a field edge. The hot doe stopped to urinate at 25 yards. The buck came over to test the urine and lip curled. Then the buck grunted and pushed the doe by us at 15 yards. I grunted to stop the buck. My son made the shot. The buck made it just under 100 yards. My son’s reaction was priceless as the bucks legs started to give out and he dropped into the draw just out of sight. That is when my son’s legs started to give out and the adrenaline dump started. I guarantee at age 9 he put in more hours in the stand this Fall than most bowhunters in Iowa. And passed bucks that 90% of the bowhunters in Iowa wouldn’t have.

If he would have killed the first buck that got in range he would been done the first sit. How does that build a love for the sport? How does that allow him to witness the rut and deer interactions? How does that teach him about being a good manager of the resources? How would he have gotten to experience how the other animals live and act? So he filled his bow tag and then ate his other tag because he didn’t get a chance at the other cull bucks on farm. So what would taking away a tag have done other than taking away days afield??? What does taking away a tag from anyone actually do??? Absolutely nothing!!! I guarantee it will not lead to more 180” deer. It will cause the problems I posted in my previous post.

If he would have shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had another tag he would have missed seeing a squirrel fall 25’ out of a tree when the branch he jumped to broke. He would have missed seeing two raccoons fighting over the last spot in a den hole tree one morning. He would have missed seeing 20 turkey pitch out of the trees and land in the timber around him. He would have missed seeing a covey of quail flush at his feet walking into a stand one afternoon. He would have missed hearing and watching rooster pheasants cackling and moving around the CRP at first light. He would have missed the chickadee that landed on the shooting rail of his stand and sat there looking at him trying to figure out what he was. That is just a few of the things he would have not experienced this Fall if he shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had a second tag.

There is so much more to recruiting kids or retaining adults to the sport than just congratulations you got a buck! If that is why you deer hunt I feel sorry for you. If that is how you brought your kids into the sport I feel sorry for them. If the only thing that matters to you is the size of your bucks rack I feel sorry for you. Being in nature and watching Gods creation is so much more important than “I got a buck”. Or “my buck scored 185 3/8”. Filling your tag should be the last thing you think about when hunting. That is what I teach my kids anyway. No pressure. Go out and have fun. Enjoy what God has created. If a mature buck comes by take your time, focus on the spot and squeeze the shot off. The tag in their pocket is the reason to get up and go out and experience it. That tag in their pocket is what helps them develop a love of the land and all our resources. Having the opportunity to bow and gun hunt just gives them additional opportunities to be afield. Additional opportunities to enjoy God’s creation. Because someday after killing enough big bucks they won’t be drawn to the outdoors for that reason. Hopefully when that time comes the love of the land and all of God’s creation will be. Then they will spend their November, December and January sitting in a stand passing that love on to their children. That is what recruits and retains lifelong hunters.

That is what will keep our hunting tradition going.
…Not congratulations you got a buck!
…Not congratulations your buck scored 185 3/8”.
…And certainly not Iowa going to a one buck State.
So I’m going to say- I quit reading this pretty quick when you keeping talking about time afield. No one is stopping anyone from going out and just sitting- tag or not? Heck start rabbit hunting early and late- why is it “unjust” if we ended deer season Dec 31- after 3 months of solid hunting? Literally no one is taking away time to “be outdoors”.
 
So I’m going to say- I quit reading this pretty quick when you keeping talking about time afield. No one is stopping anyone from going out and just sitting- tag or not? Heck start rabbit hunting early and late- why is it “unjust” if we ended deer season Dec 31- after 3 months of solid hunting? Literally no one is taking away time to “be outdoors”.
Why do you want to end season Dec 31st vs Jan 10th? Some people only hunt late muzzleloader. So they haven’t been hunting for three months. So this years it was Dec 23rd through Jan 10th. Those that hunt it also have to work around Christmas and New Years holidays. If they work and had family commitments on the holidays then they only had two weekends or four days to hunt. You think four days is excessive and just too much?

Some only hunt first season shotgun, many of those only hunt two of the five days.

Some only hunt second season shotgun with most only hunting four of the eight days.

Some only bow hunt. I would be surprised if most licensed bowhunters hunted more than 10 days a Fall.

Deer season may last three months but most hunting takes place on weekends or holidays unless someone takes vacation to do it. Most are not die hards so they don’t do it every chance they get.

So most deer/deer herds or private properties in general are not hunted solid for three months. Most private land sees minimal pressure maybe two or three days a week during certain seasons and public varies on location and habitat.

So what is your reason for stopping season Dec 31st? Because you have deemed it enough or too much?
You said no one is stopping you from going afield and sitting without a tag. Look maybe 1/1000 people would go sit in a cold tree stand just to watch the wildlife. If you have a kid ask them when they get home from school if they want to go sit in a stand tonight and watch deer.
I just asked my 9 year old when we were walking from school to our house in the cold wind if he wanted to sit in a tree stand tonight and watch deer. He just laughed and said “no”. He knows season is over. Not worth freezing if there is no chance of getting something. I asked him if he had a tag and could hunt tonight would he want to go? Without hesitation he said “Yes”.

You said “Literally no one is taking away time to “be outdoors””. Well you would be taking away 10 days of someone’s time to be outdoors late muzzleloader hunting if you closed Dec 31st.

I would like to hear why? Because the argument of three months of solid hunting may sound like a good talking point but is total BS other than maybe a few pieces of public property and a few pieces of private that are basically open to everyone. Those pieces may see heavy pressure. However, most of the deer on those pieces have relocated to other private property by Christmas. Closing season Dec 31 won’t help you kill a bigger buck or help the deer herd in general. By late muzzleloader most of the deer have relocated to private property with food, cover, and low to no pressure. It won’t make any difference other than condensing hunters to less days on both private property and public thus decreasing their experience.
 
Iowaqdm— I’d wager $$ I’ve got more kids into hunting than you have. With 4 boys of my own, their friends and dozens every year on group Pheasant Forever youth hunts.

The 1 buck limit would have no impact on youth hunting! Youth hunters like to hunt and if they shoot a buck they can still chase small game, pheasants, waterfowl, or maybe fall fishing ?
If kids enjoy hunting, they will make it a lifelong sport !
 
Last edited:
One buck limit does not mean 1 tag limit. Hunt all bow season. If you didn't shoot a buck, buy a gun tag. As soon as you register a buck, any remaining either sex tags are now valid only for a doe or just invalid. Not that hard with the registration system we have.
 
I’d like to start small and irritate as few people on here as well as other hunters in the state as possible and take meaningful steps to limit the doe harvest and eventually increase the overall population. Reduce anterless tag numbers, no January anterless seasons and probably going to doe only during first shotgun season where it might help. We have it great here and have little to complain about in the grand scheme of things compared to other states. It could be way worse!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
One buck period. Landowner or not. And I'm a landowner.

This is absolutely the only way to truly be a one buck state. I personally don’t think it’s necessary to go to one buck yet but that’s a whole other subject and I do understand the possible advantages. I do have a lot of respect for this tho. Anything other than one buck for everyone is the equivalent to our government passing laws that they don’t have to follow. Multiple bucks for the lords and only 1 for the peasants will go nowhere. Rightfully so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom