hillrunner
PMA Member
Paragraphs man.
Nah. I'm good.You’d rather burn the resource to the ground before you give up your “god given rights”
Makes sense……..
Yep. Don't make Iowa an 'Elitist' deer hunting state, which we're well on our way to being already.... I think some of you guys are being short sighted, maybe selfish and some just not thinking about the future of Iowa deer hunting. All you’re thinking about is wanting to shoot a bigger buck ...
OkParagraphs man.
Ha, you better have another whiskey for the night. This makes zero sense………Yep. Don't make Iowa an 'Elitist' deer hunting state, which we're well on our way to being already.
So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?With all due respect. I think some of you guys are being short sighted, maybe selfish and some just not thinking about the future of Iowa deer hunting. All you’re thinking about is wanting to shoot a bigger buck and I get it.
Our problem isn’t too many hunters, lack of deer or a lack of quality bucks. Our problem is declining habitat and access to private property. Decreasing the season by 10 days just concentrates hunters using public property or private land that is open to multiple people. This will lead to a diminished experience due to increased pressure. Which leads to people quitting the sport.
Let’s say we go to one buck plus 1 LO. Are you going to make the regular buck tag floating like the LO? If the tag isn’t a floating tag then you or your kids don’t get to do both bow and gun hunting. Now you just decreased their exposure to different types of hunting and their days afield and yours significantly. And what are you trying to accomplish? Save a few bucks?
You can’t control what happens on the neighbors property and you will never be able to save all the bucks on your property. All you can control is how many deer and more importantly what deer you kill.
The reality is more properties are being managed every year. Unfortunately there is also decreasing habitat. One guy is adding or improving his habitat and the guy across the fence is tearing his out. So the deer relocate to the property with the habitat. There is also less ground available each year because more people are trying to access the land that still has the habitat which leads to guys being displaced. Just think of how many dozers and excavators you have seen in a field with all the trees and brush piled up ready to burn and bury. The removal of habitat is not going to slow anytime soon.
Every year less kids are being introduced and taking up the sport. Every year there are less guys party hunting during shotgun. Instead of 5 guys pushing a half section now it is one guy sitting in a box blind overlooking a food plot. The other 4 guys quit because they lost access to the half section. All this is leading to less tags being sold. This leads to less revenue for the DNR.
What you’re going to accomplish with all these wishes is the exact opposite of what you’re hoping for. What will happen is there will be less tags sold which means less revenue coming into the DNR. This will force the DNR to push to increase license sales. First they will add crossbows to regular archery season to boost license sales. This will be detrimental to buck age structure and access. Then when the addition of crossbows doesn’t fix the budget issues they push to increase NR tags quotas to make up for the shortcomings.
Every NR tag purchased is equal to approximately 20 resident tags. So if they add 5000 additional NR tags that would offset approximately 100,000 less resident tags sold. Then with the increased NR tags allotments there will be increased leasing pressure and land purchases by outfitters. This will lead to decreased access to quality ground, increased recreational land prices, land fragmentation and ultimately decreased age structure just like it has for Illinois, Kansas, Ohio, Indiana, etc.
The DNR needs to sell tags to fund their department. With every resident hunter having one less opportunity to buy a buck tag that means one less resident tag sold. Not to mention each hunter will be in the field less days and therefore probably less likely buy an additional doe tag just incase they get an opportunity. Which will ultimately lead to even less revenue for the DNR. There will be some very detrimental consequences that you won’t be able to reverse if some of these wishes come true.
I would recommend just leaving things alone. Work to educate other hunters when the deer numbers are down due to EHD or over harvest. January antlerless seasons are a pain and I don’t like them but they are the DNR’s chosen tool in CWD areas to slow spread. (Which I don’t think does anything to slow the spread but that is another discussion). I would argue that the January antlerless season is better than sharp shooters shooting deer off corn piles like they do in Missouri. I would also argue that with the January antlerless season you still control what is being harvested versus a sharp shooter killing everything they can get a shot at over corn.
Again, you can only control what you are harvesting. Quit trying to change the regulations just because you didn’t get a chance at a 180” buck this year and do what you can to educate others about deer numbers and management practices.
Bingo!So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?
That makes no sense ?
They’ve successfully harvested a buck, congratulations! If that’s not good enough for them, that’s a huge problem !
I would have to agree with you. From reading post on here and couple other websites. When folks are talking about managing a healthy deer herd, I get the feeling they're complaining more about not seeing bigger, older bucks. Hence the comments about the orange army's mentality if it's brown it's down. I'm picky and haven't shot a deer in two years now. Seen plenty, just not what I wanted to shoot. We decided not to shoot any doe this year. Saw good numbers, little less than previous, and several bucks. One guy did shoot a nice 9 that hunts on my brother's place.^^^, lots of good points.
Bottom line is, (with all states), this Big Buck " crap" has (killed) hunting as we knew it.
And yes, I'm guilty as hell myself.
I think there is also an issue with soooo many "land managers" out there now. All going for older age class, big deer. If that's all the majority of people shoot anymore, there isn't enough to go around and we end up with less big deer to hunt. Highgrading I have heard it termed.I would have to agree with you. From reading post on here and couple other websites. When folks are talking about managing a healthy deer herd, I get the feeling they're complaining more about not seeing bigger, older bucks. Hence the comments about the orange army's mentality if it's brown it's down. I'm picky and haven't shot a deer in two years now. Seen plenty, just not what I wanted to shoot. We decided not to shoot any doe this year. Saw good numbers, little less than previous, and several bucks. One guy did shoot a nice 9 that hunts on my brother's place.
You guys just don’t get it. It’s not about shooting a buck. It’s not about shooting two bucks! It’s about having opportunities to be afield. Shortening the season or taking away a tag is not going to help recruit kids or retain current hunters. Kids aren’t recruited by killing a buck. Hell, I can take any kid that can hit a paper plate at 100 yards and have them harvest a buck in less than 2 hours. We’ll climb into one of my box blinds at 3:30 pm and by 5:30 pm they can have one laying on the ground. If you think that will make them a lifelong deer hunter you’re crazy. If you knew how many times I have made one of my kids pass a deer just so they would have to spend more time hunting you wouldn’t believe me. Why… because of all the other things they would have missed by being done so quick.So you are saying in a one buck state, hunter recruitment or youth hunters suffer because they can’t shoot 2 or 3 bucks ?
That makes no sense ?
They’ve successfully harvested a buck, congratulations! If that’s not good enough for them, that’s a huge problem !
So I’m going to say- I quit reading this pretty quick when you keeping talking about time afield. No one is stopping anyone from going out and just sitting- tag or not? Heck start rabbit hunting early and late- why is it “unjust” if we ended deer season Dec 31- after 3 months of solid hunting? Literally no one is taking away time to “be outdoors”.You guys just don’t get it. It’s not about shooting a buck. It’s not about shooting two bucks! It’s about having opportunities to be afield. Shortening the season or taking away a tag is not going to help recruit kids or retain current hunters. Kids aren’t recruited by killing a buck. Hell, I can take any kid that can hit a paper plate at 100 yards and have them harvest a buck in less than 2 hours. We’ll climb into one of my box blinds at 3:30 pm and by 5:30 pm they can have one laying on the ground. If you think that will make them a lifelong deer hunter you’re crazy. If you knew how many times I have made one of my kids pass a deer just so they would have to spend more time hunting you wouldn’t believe me. Why… because of all the other things they would have missed by being done so quick.
This year I spent my whole November sitting with my 9 year old hunting for his first bow deer. I watched him pass a nice 150” 3 1/2 at 10 yards, a nice 140” 2 1/2 at 10 yards, Numerous other 2 1/2 and 1 1/2 year old bucks at under 15 yards. He ended up taking a big 5 1/2 year old cull buck. He got to watching that buck push a hot doe a hundred yards down a field edge. The hot doe stopped to urinate at 25 yards. The buck came over to test the urine and lip curled. Then the buck grunted and pushed the doe by us at 15 yards. I grunted to stop the buck. My son made the shot. The buck made it just under 100 yards. My son’s reaction was priceless as the bucks legs started to give out and he dropped into the draw just out of sight. That is when my son’s legs started to give out and the adrenaline dump started. I guarantee at age 9 he put in more hours in the stand this Fall than most bowhunters in Iowa. And passed bucks that 90% of the bowhunters in Iowa wouldn’t have.
If he would have killed the first buck that got in range he would been done the first sit. How does that build a love for the sport? How does that allow him to witness the rut and deer interactions? How does that teach him about being a good manager of the resources? How would he have gotten to experience how the other animals live and act? So he filled his bow tag and then ate his other tag because he didn’t get a chance at the other cull bucks on farm. So what would taking away a tag have done other than taking away days afield??? What does taking away a tag from anyone actually do??? Absolutely nothing!!! I guarantee it will not lead to more 180” deer. It will cause the problems I posted in my previous post.
If he would have shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had another tag he would have missed seeing a squirrel fall 25’ out of a tree when the branch he jumped to broke. He would have missed seeing two raccoons fighting over the last spot in a den hole tree one morning. He would have missed seeing 20 turkey pitch out of the trees and land in the timber around him. He would have missed seeing a covey of quail flush at his feet walking into a stand one afternoon. He would have missed hearing and watching rooster pheasants cackling and moving around the CRP at first light. He would have missed the chickadee that landed on the shooting rail of his stand and sat there looking at him trying to figure out what he was. That is just a few of the things he would have not experienced this Fall if he shot the first buck he had a chance at or not had a second tag.
There is so much more to recruiting kids or retaining adults to the sport than just congratulations you got a buck! If that is why you deer hunt I feel sorry for you. If that is how you brought your kids into the sport I feel sorry for them. If the only thing that matters to you is the size of your bucks rack I feel sorry for you. Being in nature and watching Gods creation is so much more important than “I got a buck”. Or “my buck scored 185 3/8”. Filling your tag should be the last thing you think about when hunting. That is what I teach my kids anyway. No pressure. Go out and have fun. Enjoy what God has created. If a mature buck comes by take your time, focus on the spot and squeeze the shot off. The tag in their pocket is the reason to get up and go out and experience it. That tag in their pocket is what helps them develop a love of the land and all our resources. Having the opportunity to bow and gun hunt just gives them additional opportunities to be afield. Additional opportunities to enjoy God’s creation. Because someday after killing enough big bucks they won’t be drawn to the outdoors for that reason. Hopefully when that time comes the love of the land and all of God’s creation will be. Then they will spend their November, December and January sitting in a stand passing that love on to their children. That is what recruits and retains lifelong hunters.
That is what will keep our hunting tradition going.
…Not congratulations you got a buck!
…Not congratulations your buck scored 185 3/8”.
…And certainly not Iowa going to a one buck State.
Why do you want to end season Dec 31st vs Jan 10th? Some people only hunt late muzzleloader. So they haven’t been hunting for three months. So this years it was Dec 23rd through Jan 10th. Those that hunt it also have to work around Christmas and New Years holidays. If they work and had family commitments on the holidays then they only had two weekends or four days to hunt. You think four days is excessive and just too much?So I’m going to say- I quit reading this pretty quick when you keeping talking about time afield. No one is stopping anyone from going out and just sitting- tag or not? Heck start rabbit hunting early and late- why is it “unjust” if we ended deer season Dec 31- after 3 months of solid hunting? Literally no one is taking away time to “be outdoors”.
One buck period. Landowner or not. And I'm a landowner.