R
Rembrandt
Guest
Iowa Fish and Game has just published the first story & pictures on how the Lovstuen buck was harvested.
The article got mixed reactions from our hunting camp....more on that later.
Article was difficult to follow, most had to read it 2 and 3 times to grasp the role of each player. Normally a "first person" narrative mixed with facts works well for a story. However a first person narrative with four individuals was awkward at best. I think we counted one paragraph in particular that used "I", "my", and "me" roughly 12 times, then had to go back to find which person it was refering to. Overall our group thought it was poorly written. Most stories will leave the reader feeling good and informed...it just didn't happen on this one.
The group was also disturbed by the three adults working as a collective team...pursueing the deer day and night with 6 trail cams (which were checked daily)....then near the eve of the Archery season opening date, they go and get a youngster to pull the trigger during the youth season. Appeared this was the only way to get the deer before archers or someone else began putting more pressure on it. Had all the earmarks of "Party Hunting" with only one person having a tag, but still remains a legal take.
Some thought the use of that many cameras to aid in locating the buck was comparable to using electronic devices (ie: 2 way radios, lights, tracking collar), giving the hunters an unfair advantage.
Our group discussed how many of the existing World Record Class bucks have been taken, one-on-one for the most part. But this one seemed different...sort of like parents doing their childs homework and giving them the answers for the test...or the analogy of a parent that professionally builds a "soap box racer" for their child...when other cars were built by kids with their own hands.
The buck "is" legitimate and "is" Tony Lovstuen's...let's make no mistake about that...seemed like the story was more about adults with buck fever than the youngster and his deer, sadly we had hoped it would be different....our group was dissappointed.
The article got mixed reactions from our hunting camp....more on that later.
Article was difficult to follow, most had to read it 2 and 3 times to grasp the role of each player. Normally a "first person" narrative mixed with facts works well for a story. However a first person narrative with four individuals was awkward at best. I think we counted one paragraph in particular that used "I", "my", and "me" roughly 12 times, then had to go back to find which person it was refering to. Overall our group thought it was poorly written. Most stories will leave the reader feeling good and informed...it just didn't happen on this one.
The group was also disturbed by the three adults working as a collective team...pursueing the deer day and night with 6 trail cams (which were checked daily)....then near the eve of the Archery season opening date, they go and get a youngster to pull the trigger during the youth season. Appeared this was the only way to get the deer before archers or someone else began putting more pressure on it. Had all the earmarks of "Party Hunting" with only one person having a tag, but still remains a legal take.
Some thought the use of that many cameras to aid in locating the buck was comparable to using electronic devices (ie: 2 way radios, lights, tracking collar), giving the hunters an unfair advantage.
Our group discussed how many of the existing World Record Class bucks have been taken, one-on-one for the most part. But this one seemed different...sort of like parents doing their childs homework and giving them the answers for the test...or the analogy of a parent that professionally builds a "soap box racer" for their child...when other cars were built by kids with their own hands.
The buck "is" legitimate and "is" Tony Lovstuen's...let's make no mistake about that...seemed like the story was more about adults with buck fever than the youngster and his deer, sadly we had hoped it would be different....our group was dissappointed.